Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39427170›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Randomised-crossover clinical trial on the substantivity of a single application of a gel containing chlorhexidine and o-cymen-5-ol on the oral biofilm and saliva.

B Suárez-Rodríguez, A Regueira-Iglesias, T Blanco-Pintos, A Sánchez-Barco, N Vila-Blanco, C Balsa-Castro, M J Carreira, I Tomás

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

B Suárez-RodríguezOral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical- Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (FIDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
A Regueira-IglesiasOral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical- Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (FIDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain. alba.regueira.iglesias@sergas.es.
T Blanco-PintosOral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical- Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (FIDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
A Sánchez-BarcoOral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical- Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (FIDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
N Vila-BlancoCentro Singular de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Intelixentes (CiTIUS) and Departamento de Electrónica e Computación, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (FIDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
C Balsa-CastroOral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical- Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (FIDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
M J CarreiraCentro Singular de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Intelixentes (CiTIUS) and Departamento de Electrónica e Computación, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (FIDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
I TomásOral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical- Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (FIDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain. inmaculada.tomas@usc.es.

Funding

Lacer, S. A. 2021-CE161Xunta de Galicia - Consellería de Cultura, Educación, Formación Profesional e Universidades and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) ED431G-2023/04; GRC2021/48
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo clinical trials have evaluated the antimicrobial activity and substantivity of gel formulations containing chlorhexidine (CHX) and cymenol.

objectiveTo compare the in situ antimicrobial effect and substantivity of a new 0.20% CHX + cymenol gel (test) with the current 0.20% CHX gel formulation (control) on salivary flora and dental plaque biofilm up to seven hours after a single application.

methodsA randomised-crossover clinical trial was conducted with 29 orally healthy volunteers participating in the development of Experiments 1 (saliva) and 2 (dental plaque biofilm). All subjects participated in both experiments and were randomly assigned to receive either the test or control gels. Samples were collected at baseline and five minutes and one, three, five, and seven hours after a single application of the products. The specimens were processed using confocal laser scanning microscopy after staining with the LIVE/DEAD

resultsIn Experiment 1, the mean baseline BV was significantly reduced five minutes after application in the test group (87.00% vs. 26.50%; p < 0.01). This effect was maintained throughout all sampling times and continued up to seven hours (40.40%, p < 0.01). The CHX control followed the same pattern. In Experiment 2, the mean baseline BV was also significantly lower five minutes after applying the test gel for: (1) the total thickness of biofilm (91.00% vs. 5.80%; p < 0.01); (2) the upper layer (91.29% vs. 3.94%; p < 0.01); and (3) the lower layer (86.29% vs. 3.83%; p < 0.01). The reduction of BV from baseline was observed for the full-thickness and by layers at all sampling moments and continued seven hours after application (21.30%, 24.13%, and 22.06%, respectively; p < 0.01). Again, the control group showed similar results. No significant differences between test and control gels were observed in either saliva or dental plaque biofilm at any sampling time.

conclusionsA 0.20% CHX + cymenol gel application demonstrates potent and immediate antimicrobial activity on salivary flora and de novo biofilm. This effect is maintained seven hours after application. Similar effects are obtained with a 0.20% CHX-only gel.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalBiofilmsChlorhexidineCross-Over StudiesDental PlaqueGelsSalivaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial ViabilityMicroscopy, ConfocalYoung AdultAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineGelsAutomated computationBacterial viabilityChlorhexidineConfocal laser scanning microscopyCymenolGelOral biofilmSaliva

Identifiers

PMID39427170
PMCPMC11490038

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.