ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024
Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of lymph node ratio after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- The prognostic value of log odds of positive lymph nodes in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: results from the SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
- Improving Prognostic Stratification in Gastric Cancer: The Role of Lymph Node Staging Systems.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Article
- Lymph Node Yield and Lymph Node Ratio for Prognosis of Long-Term Survival in Gastric Carcinoma.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined.
resultsOverall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798-21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341-8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN.
conclusionsLNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.