Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39428884›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Online self-evaluation of fMRI-based neurofeedback performance.

Santiago Muñoz-Moldes, Anita Tursic, Michael Lührs, Judith Eck, Amaia Benitez Andonegui, Judith Peters, Axel Cleeremans, Rainer Goebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neurofeedback: new territories and neurocognitive mechanisms of endogenous neuromodulation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Online self-evaluation of fMRI-based neurofeedback performance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Santiago Muñoz-MoldesConsciousness, Cognition and Computation group, Center for Research in Cognition & Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Université Libre de Bruxelles , Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-8617
Anita TursicBrain Innovation B.V., Research Department , Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4224-2249
Michael LührsBrain Innovation B.V., Research Department , Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5888-0843
Judith EckBrain Innovation B.V., Research Department , Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9938-0781
Amaia Benitez AndoneguiDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University , Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6364-7272
Judith PetersDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University , Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0979-1016
Axel CleeremansConsciousness, Cognition and Computation group, Center for Research in Cognition & Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Université Libre de Bruxelles , Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9757-5235
Rainer GoebelBrain Innovation B.V., Research Department , Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1780-2467

Funding

European Research CouncilFondation Philippe Wiener - Maurice AnspachFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSSeventh Framework Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the subjective evaluation of supplementary motor area (SMA) regulation performance in a real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (fMRI-NF) task. In fMRI-NF, people learn how to self-regulate their brain activity by performing mental actions to achieve a certain target level (TL) of blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) activation. Here, we studied two types of self-evaluation: performance predictions and perceived confidence in the prediction judgement. Participants completed three sessions of SMA regulation in a 7 T fMRI scanner, performing a mental drawing task. During each trial, they modulated their imagery strategy to achieve one of two different levels of SMA activation and reported a performance prediction and their confidence in the prediction before receiving delayed BOLD-activation feedback. Results show that participants' performance predictions improved with learning throughout the three sessions, and that these improvements were not driven exclusively by their knowledge of previous performance. Confidence reports on the other hand showed no change throughout training and did not correlate with better and worse predictions. In addition to shedding light on mechanisms of internal self-evaluation during neurofeedback training, these results also point to a dissociation between predictions of performance and confidence reports in the presence of feedback. This article is part of the theme issue 'Neurofeedback: new territories and neurocognitive mechanisms of endogenous neuromodulation'.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeurofeedbackAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexSelf-AssessmentYoung Adultconfidencefunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)metacognitionneurofeedbackself-evaluationself-regulation

Identifiers

PMID39428884
PMCPMC11491843

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.