ReviewCureus2024
Comparative Analysis of Bariatric Surgery and Non-surgical Therapies: Impact on Obesity-Related Comorbidities.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative Triglyceride-Glucose Index as a Predictor of Weight Loss Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- The psychopathological profile of candidates for metabolic bariatric surgery: a transdiagnostic and network approach.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Adipokine profiles and genetic variants of leptin receptor, adiponectin, and ghrelin pathways in obesity: prospective 12-month outcomes after bariatric interventions.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Hypocaloric Diet in Reducing Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Obese Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Using large language models to directly screen electronic databases as an alternative to traditional search strategies such as the Cochrane highly sensitive search for filtering randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews.Research synthesis methods · 2025Article
- Demographic and clinical predictors of bariatric surgery patients: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2025Article
- Leisure-Time Physical Activity Patterns and Predictors in Patients Before and After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Cross-sectional Study.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Hyperuricemia Remission After Sleeve Gastrectomy in Chinese Patients and Establishment of a Preoperative Predictive Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study with a Mean Follow-Up of 20 Months.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity is associated with a broad spectrum of comorbidities, including metabolic dysregulation, cardiovascular complications, and socioeconomic impacts. Traditional lifestyle interventions often yield transient results in weight management, while bariatric surgery offers a promising alternative. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and focused on randomized controlled trials comparing bariatric surgery (e.g., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG)) with non-surgical therapies (drug therapy and lifestyle modifications) in the management of obesity-related comorbidities, particularly hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We comprehensively searched databases like PubMed, PMC, and EBSCO using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms related to obesity, bariatric surgery, and non-surgical treatments. We included seven studies involving participants aged 18-64 published within the last six years. We rigorously assessed these studies for quality and extracted data to evaluate outcomes such as weight loss, diabetes remission rates, hypertension management, and renal function. The review found that bariatric surgery consistently resulted in substantial and sustained weight loss compared to non-surgical therapies. Surgical interventions significantly improved hypertension control, reduced cardiovascular risks, and enhanced glycemic control in diabetic patients. The effectiveness of bariatric surgery in promoting diabetes remission was attributed not only to weight loss but also to physiological changes in gastrointestinal anatomy, gut hormones, and energy balance regulation. Limitations identified in the literature included variations in study methodologies, follow-up durations, and patient characteristics, which limited direct comparisons and generalizations. Future research should incorporate more extended follow-up periods and standardized methods to further validate these findings' durability and broad applicability across diverse patient populations. In conclusion, bariatric surgery emerges as an effective treatment option for managing obesity-related comorbidities, particularly hypertension and T2DM. While acknowledging the inherent risks and complexities associated with surgical interventions, ongoing research and clinical innovations are crucial to optimizing patient outcomes and reducing the global burden of obesity-related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.