Evidence mapPaperPMID 39429274Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Comparative Analysis of Bariatric Surgery and Non-surgical Therapies: Impact on Obesity-Related Comorbidities.

Fnu Abhishek, Grace D Ogunkoya, Jaikirat Singh Gugnani, Harkamalpreet Kaur, Sakshi Muskawad, Mankaranvir Singh, Gurpreet Singh, Ujjwal Soni, Dhawani Julka, Abasi-Okot Udoyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fnu AbhishekInternal Medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Amritsar, IND.
Grace D OgunkoyaFamily Medicine, Finnih Medical Center, Lagos, NGA.
Jaikirat Singh GugnaniInternal Medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Amritsar, IND.
Harkamalpreet KaurInternal Medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Amritsar, IND.
Sakshi MuskawadMedicine and Surgery, Anna Medical College, Montagne Blanche, MUS.
Mankaranvir SinghMedicine and Surgery, Government Medical College, Patiala, Patiala, IND.
Gurpreet SinghInternal Medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Amritsar, IND.
Ujjwal SoniMedicine, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Dhawani JulkaMedicine, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Abasi-Okot UdoyenGeneral Medicine, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, UKR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is associated with a broad spectrum of comorbidities, including metabolic dysregulation, cardiovascular complications, and socioeconomic impacts. Traditional lifestyle interventions often yield transient results in weight management, while bariatric surgery offers a promising alternative. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and focused on randomized controlled trials comparing bariatric surgery (e.g., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG)) with non-surgical therapies (drug therapy and lifestyle modifications) in the management of obesity-related comorbidities, particularly hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We comprehensively searched databases like PubMed, PMC, and EBSCO using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms related to obesity, bariatric surgery, and non-surgical treatments. We included seven studies involving participants aged 18-64 published within the last six years. We rigorously assessed these studies for quality and extracted data to evaluate outcomes such as weight loss, diabetes remission rates, hypertension management, and renal function. The review found that bariatric surgery consistently resulted in substantial and sustained weight loss compared to non-surgical therapies. Surgical interventions significantly improved hypertension control, reduced cardiovascular risks, and enhanced glycemic control in diabetic patients. The effectiveness of bariatric surgery in promoting diabetes remission was attributed not only to weight loss but also to physiological changes in gastrointestinal anatomy, gut hormones, and energy balance regulation. Limitations identified in the literature included variations in study methodologies, follow-up durations, and patient characteristics, which limited direct comparisons and generalizations. Future research should incorporate more extended follow-up periods and standardized methods to further validate these findings' durability and broad applicability across diverse patient populations. In conclusion, bariatric surgery emerges as an effective treatment option for managing obesity-related comorbidities, particularly hypertension and T2DM. While acknowledging the inherent risks and complexities associated with surgical interventions, ongoing research and clinical innovations are crucial to optimizing patient outcomes and reducing the global burden of obesity-related diseases.

Indexed as

bariatric surgerygastric bypass surgeryhypertension in the global contextobesity and overweightobesity treatmentroux-en-ytype 2 diabetesweight loss intervention

Identifiers

PMID39429274
PMCPMC11488464

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.