ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
A method framework of semi-automatic knee bone segmentation and reconstruction from computed tomography (CT) images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate delineation of knee bone boundaries is crucial for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and effective treatment planning in knee diseases. Current methods often struggle with precise segmentation due to the knee joint's complexity, which includes intricate bone structures and overlapping soft tissues. These challenges are further complicated by variations in patient anatomy and image quality, highlighting the need for improved techniques. This paper presents a novel semi-automatic segmentation method for extracting knee bones from sequential computed tomography (CT) images. Methods: Our approach integrates the fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithm with an adaptive region-based active contour model (ACM). Initially, the FCM algorithm assigns membership degrees to each voxel, distinguishing bone regions from surrounding soft tissues based on their likelihood of belonging to specific bone regions. Subsequently, the adaptive region-based ACM utilizes these membership degrees to guide the contour evolution and refine segmentation boundaries. To ensure clinical applicability, we further enhance our method using the marching cubes algorithm to reconstruct a three-dimensional (3D) model. We evaluated the method on six randomly selected knee joints. Results: We evaluated the method using quantitative metrics such as the Dice coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, and geometrical assessment. Our method achieved high Dice scores for the femur (98.95%), tibia (98.10%), and patella (97.14%), demonstrating superior accuracy. Remarkably low root mean square distance (RSD) values were obtained for the tibia and femur (0.5±0.14 mm) and patella (0.6±0.13 mm), indicating precise segmentation. Conclusions: The proposed method offers significant advancements in CAD systems for knee pathologies. Our approach demonstrates superior performance in achieving precise and accurate segmentation of knee bones, providing valuable insights for anatomical analysis, surgical planning, and patient-specific prostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.