ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Use of connected injection device has a positive effect on catch-up growth in patients with growth disorders treated with growth hormone therapy.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacovigilance evaluation of somatrogon-associated adverse events in real-world databases.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Value, development challenges, and strategies for gaining internal endorsement of digitally connected subcutaneous drug delivery devices: a survey of pharmaceutical stakeholders.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Adherence and Growth Outcomes in a Large Cohort of Children Treated With Recombinant GH Using a Connected Auto-injector.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025Article
- The role of digital health in growth hormone therapy: perspectives from Gulf Cooperation Council pediatric endocrinologists.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Human growth hormone (hGH) therapy in children can be administered by subcutaneous injection using either a manual non-connected device, which is a portable injection pen loaded with a pre-filled cartridge, or an electronic connected device. The electronic device is connected to a platform where adherence data is recorded and available for health care professionals (HCPs) and patient support programs. Real-world data used in the clinic, includes regular monitoring of adherence data which are shared with families during patients' visits and aim to determine the root causes of poor adherence. This study aimed to identify whether there are differences in growth during the first four years of treatment depending on the device, i.e. non-connected versus connected devices. Methods: This retrospective study reports treatment of either GH deficiency or short stature secondary to birth size small for gestational age (SGA) in 174 pediatric patients attending Miguel Servet Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain. hGH treatment was administered with manual non-connected devices in 87 patients and 87 patients used connected devices. Height was followed for 4 years after start of hGH therapy. Results: In total, 57% of subjects had GHD and 43% were SGA. Height standard deviation score (HSDS) at treatment start was higher (p<0.001) in the non-connected device group compared to the connected device group. Change of HSDS in the connected device group was significantly higher in the second (+0.13), third (+0.20) and fourth (+0.23) year of treatment compared to the non-connected group after adjustment for age and HSDS at treatment start, sex, indication, dose and Tanner stages during treatment, and timing of measurements. Discussion: These results support the use of the connected device for hGH treatment of pediatric growth disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.