Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429757›Full record

ArticleThe Linacre quarterly2024

An Evaluation of Controversial Statements in Etica Teologica Della Vita.

Elvis I Šeman, Eamonn M Mathieson, Umberto P Villa, Deirdre T Little, Randy Dlr Juanta, Paschal Corby, John I Fleming, Brendan Purcell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Linacre quarterly, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elvis I ŠemanAdjunct Associate Professor in the College of Medicine and Public Health , Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9376-7811
Eamonn M MathiesonMercy Hospital for Women, Anaesthetic Department, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6601-3410
Umberto P VillaAustralian Catholic Medical Association, Tiwi, Australia.
Deirdre T LittleMedical Director of Lily Rose Antenatal Clinic, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia.
Randy Dlr JuantaAustralian Catholic Medical Association, NSW, Australia.
Paschal CorbyLecturer in Moral Theology/Bioethics, University of Notre Dame, Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4962-8101
John I FlemingPontifical Academy for Life, Vatican. (Retired), Adelaide, Australia.
Brendan PurcellAdjunct Professor at Notre Dame (Australia) Sydney Campus, Broadway, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The teachings of the Catholic Church on human sexuality, contraception and the treatment of infertility are well established and clearly explained in many Church documents, including Humanae vitae and Familiaris consortio. In 2022, a book was published in Italian which reported on a seminar organised by an Academy of the Catholic Church about the ethics of life. Titled the Theological Ethics of Life (abbreviated 'ETV' in Italian), the conclusion of chapter VII contains statements about contraception and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) which, though somewhat difficult to interpret, appear to be controversial with regard to accepted Church teaching on these subjects. This paper presents a detailed analysis by a group of Australian Catholic doctors and ethicists of an English translation of paragraphs 172 and 173 of ETV and concludes that they contain statements which deviate from and contradict accepted Catholic teaching on contraception and ART. The authors also claim that a thorough up-to-date knowledge and understanding of suitable current alternatives to contraception and ART (e.g. in-vitro fertilization, IVF) which are safe, effective, readily accessible and consistent with Catholic ethics appears to be lacking in paragraphs 172 and 173 of ETV. The authors suggest a better understanding of currently available methods to assist with fertility care, aided by input from Catholic medical experts working in the areas of Fertility Awareness Methods (FAMs) and Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM) would better inform ongoing debates about contraception and ART within the Church and be of service to the Faithful who should be encouraged to pursue these alternatives which are both effective and consistent with Church teaching on human sexuality and morals.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologycatholic church documentscatholic medical associationCatholic moral teachingcontraceptionEtica Teologica Della Vitafertility awareness methodshuman sexualitypontifical academy for liferestorative reproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID39429757
PMCPMC11489895

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.