ReviewHeliyon2024
Mapping research on cognitive impairment in heart failure patients: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2022.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairment is a common concern among individuals with heart failure, and the intersection of these conditions poses significant challenges for scholarly investigation. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to visually depict the current state and emerging trends regarding cognitive impairment among heart failure patients. Methods: Articles focusing on cognitive impairment in heart failure patients published between 2013 and 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection on February 3, 2023. Analysis of publication trends was conducted using Microsoft Excel 2016. The bibliometric analysis,involving identification of the leading countries, institutions, and authors, as well as the analysis of keywords co-occurrence and burst-detection, was performed using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. Results: A total of 260 original articles were included. The data showed a stable pattern of annual publications on cognitive impairment in heart failure patients over the last ten years. The United States stood out with 129 publications, Kent State University in the USA led in institutional output with 32 articles, and Gunstad John was identified as the most influential author with 32 articles and 572 citations. Analysis of keyword co-occurrence network revealed core research themes encompassing risk factors, interventions, assessment, and underlying mechanisms of cognitive impairment in heart failure patients. Conclusions: This study presents the first bibliometric analysis of research on cognitive impairment in heart failure patients over the past decade, offering valuable insights for exploring future research frontiers in this domain. The findings provide researchers, clinicians, and policymakers with key information to advance understanding and interventions for cognitive impairment in heart failure patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.