ArticleHeliyon2024
Recommendations for empirical syndemics analyses: A stepwise methodological guide.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Infection Dynamics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Noncommunicable disease syndemic among the general population in Iran: a cross-sectional study.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Syndemic theory posits that co-occurring diseases interact in a manner that increases disease transmission, progression, and negative health outcomes. And that adverse socioeconomic and environmental conditions promote this disease or health condition clustering and interaction. The concept offers two important contributions to the health sciences. First, it positions socioeconomic, structural, and environmental conditions as central to disease burdens. Second, as a portmanteau - 'syn' for synergy and 'demic' for disease epidemics - syndemic theory indicates that in some cases diseases do not merely co-occur but synergistically interact to affect an outcome that is more than the accumulation of the individual disease effects. The difficulty in operationalizing these central elements has resulted in a divergence of scholarship from the centralizing principles of the theory towards a simpler accumulation perspective in which more conditions equate to worse health outcomes. In addition, all empirical syndemic assessments should include robust qualitative assessments of the dynamics, however, much syndemic scholarship focuses only on quantitative analyses. To address these issues, a five-step approach to quantitative analyses of syndemic arrangements is proposed: (1) identifying disease clusters within a defined population; (2) determining the relevant social and structural factors that support disease clustering; (3) determining if clusters are distinct by social/demographic groups within the population; (4) evaluating if the identified disease cluster contributes to worse health outcomes; and (5) assessing for synergy between clustering diseases. This stepwise strategy ensures not only a rigorous assessment of hypothesized syndemic interactions but also presents a closer alignment of scholarship with syndemics theory. As an illustration, the approach is applied to an assessment of a hypothesized HIV/cardiovascular disease syndemic in South Africa. While syndemics theory has proven valuable in guiding public health interventions and policy, progressive improvement must be made in the application of the theory to ensure that it continues to effectively inform comprehensive practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.