SynthesisPloS one2024
Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for viral diseases: A systematic review of clinical trials.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repeated faecal microbiota transplantation for individuals with type 1 diabetes and gastroenteropathy.Diabetologia · 2025Trial
- Gut Microbiota Alterations in People Living With HIV: Dysbiosis, Immune Dysfunction and Therapeutic Perspectives.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Review
- Methodological insights into fecal microbiota transplantation: Dissecting key approaches for success.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Gut microbiome-based strategies for HIV prevention and therapy, current challenges and future prospects.Gut pathogens · 2026Review
- Interplay between viral infections and gut microbiota dysbiosis: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- The Gut Microbiome in Enteric Viral Infections: Underlying Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Article
- Gut microbiota affects PD-L1 therapy and its mechanism in melanoma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Review
- The Gut-Liver Axis: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targeting in Liver Disease.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGut microbiota play important roles in several diseases like viral infections. In this systematic review, our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in treating various viral diseases.
methodsWe conducted searches on databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar until November 2023. Clinical trials reported outcomes related to safety of FMT or its efficacy in patients with viral diseases were included. We excluded other types of studies that enrolled healthy individuals or patients with other disorders and did not use FMT. The assessment of bias risk was conducted using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) study quality evaluation tool.
resultsEight studies with total 196 participants were included. Viral diseases were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, COVID-19 and Clostridioides difficile coinfection, and cytomegalovirus colitis. In hepatitis B cases, HBeAg clearance was significant in those received FMT (p<0.01), while it was not significant in another one (p = 0.19). A clinical response was noted in 37.5% of patients with cytomegalovirus colitis, with an equal percentage achieving clinical remission post-FMT. There was a significant reduction in Clostridioides difficile relapse rate in FMT group than controls in coinfection of Clostridioides difficile and COVID-19 (2.17% vs. 42.5%, p<0.05). In patients with HIV, partial engraftment of the donor microbiome and increases in alpha diversity were observed after FMT. No severe adverse events were reported. Most studies had fair or good qualities.
conclusionsOur findings revealed FMT as a promising, safe treatment for some viral diseases. It improved viral clearance, clinical outcomes, and inflammation. However, the varying responses and small sample sizes call for more trials on FMT in viral diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.