Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39432670›Full record

SynthesisJNCI cancer spectrum2024

Impact of chemotherapy on patients with mismatch repair deficient advanced endometrial carcinomas-a meta-analysis.

Angelina Tjokrowidjaja, Peey-Sei Kok, Yoland C Antill, Clare L Scott, Linda R Mileshkin, Michael L Friedlander, Chee K Lee

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angelina TjokrowidjajaNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2050, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-6570-9683
Peey-Sei KokNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4910-4615
Yoland C AntillAustralia New Zealand Gynecological Oncology Group, Camperdown 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-5523
Clare L ScottAustralia New Zealand Gynecological Oncology Group, Camperdown 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3689-5956
Linda R MileshkinAustralia New Zealand Gynecological Oncology Group, Camperdown 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6826-6014
Michael L FriedlanderAustralia New Zealand Gynecological Oncology Group, Camperdown 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3090-795X
Chee K LeeNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-9820

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemo-immunotherapy is standard of care for women with recurrent or advanced mismatch repair deficient endometrial carcinoma. However, it is uncertain whether patients with mismatch repair deficient advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma derive less benefit from chemotherapy than those with mismatch repair proficient endometrial carcinoma.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma to determine the difference in the benefit of chemotherapy in mismatch repair deficient vs mismatch repair proficient endometrial carcinoma. Data on chemotherapy outcomes including objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were retrieved. We pooled these data using the inverse variance method and examined subgroup difference by mismatch repair status. We also compared differences in PFS and overall survival outcomes by creating individual patient data from the Kaplan-Meier curves of trial publications for sensitivity analyses.

resultsA total of 5 RCTs with 1137 participants (mismatch repair deficient, 26%; mismatch repair proficient, 74%) were included. All participants were treated with carboplatin-based chemotherapy. There was no difference between the mismatch repair deficient and mismatch repair proficient subgroups for objective response rate (66.5% vs 64.0%; P = .20 for subgroup difference), PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77 to 1.12; P = .44; median PFS = 7.6 vs 9.5 months) or overall survival (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.44; P = .88; median overall survival = not reached vs 28.6 months).

conclusionsObjective response rate, PFS, and overall survival were similar among those with mismatch repair deficient vs mismatch repair proficient endometrial cancer treated with front-line, platinum-doublet chemotherapy in RCTs. These findings reinforce the importance of combining chemotherapy together with immune checkpoint inhibitors until the results of trials comparing immune checkpoint therapy alone with combination therapy are available.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinDNA Mismatch RepairEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgression-Free SurvivalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCarboplatin

Identifiers

PMID39432670
PMCPMC11552623

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.