Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433767›Full record

ReviewNPJ microgravity2024

Space Analogs and Behavioral Health Performance Research review and recommendations checklist from ESA Topical Team.

Gabriel G De la Torre, Gernot Groemer, Ana Diaz-Artiles, Nathalie Pattyn, Jeroen Van Cutsem, Michaela Musilova, Wieslaw Kopec, Stefan Schneider, Vera Abeln, Tricia Larose and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ microgravity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Gabriel G De la TorreNeuropsychology and Experimental Psychology Lab. University of Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain. gabriel.delatorre@uca.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-5956
Gernot GroemerAustrian Space Forum (OeWF), Innsbruck, Austria.
Ana Diaz-ArtilesBioastronautics and Human Performance Lab. Texas AM University, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0459-9327
Nathalie PattynVIPER Research Unit, Royal Military Academy, Brussels, Belgium.
Jeroen Van CutsemVIPER Research Unit, Royal Military Academy, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6122-7629
Michaela MusilovaInstitute of Robotics and Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Wieslaw KopecXR Center, Polish-Japanese Academy of Information Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Stefan SchneiderInstitute for Movement and Neurosciences, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4563-9890
Vera AbelnInstitute for Movement and Neurosciences, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4054-438X
Tricia LaroseFaculty of Medicine, Institute for Health and Community Medicine. University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Fabio FerlazzoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Pierpaolo ZiviDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6063-1678
Alexandra de CarvalhoAustrian Space Forum (OeWF), Innsbruck, Austria.
Gro Mjeldheim SandalDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Leszek OrzechowskiWroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
Michel NicolasUniversity of Burgundy, Dijon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-671X
Rebecca Billette de VillemeurInstitute for Space Medicine and Physiology (MEDES), Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1024-6164
Anne Pavy-Le TraonInstitute for Space Medicine and Physiology (MEDES), Toulouse, France.
Ines AntunesDirectorate of Human and Robotic Exploration Programmes (HRE-RS). European Space Agency (ESA), Noordwijk, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Space Agency (ESA) OT2022/032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Space analog research has increased over the last few years with new analogs appearing every year. Research in this field is very important for future real mission planning, selection and training of astronauts. Analog environments offer specific characteristics that resemble to some extent the environment of a real space mission. These analog environments are especially interesting from the psychological point of view since they allow the investigation of mental and social variables in very similar conditions to those occurring during real space missions. Analog missions also represent an opportunity to test operational work and obtain information on which combination of processes and team dynamics are most optimal for completing specific aspects of the mission. A group of experts from a European Space Agency (ESA) funded topical team reviews the current situation of topic, potentialities, gaps, and recommendations for appropriate research. This review covers the different domains in space analog research including classification, main areas of behavioral health performance research in these environments and operational aspects. We also include at the end, a section with a list or tool of recommendations in the form of a checklist for the scientific community interested in doing research in this field. This checklist can be useful to maintain optimal standards of methodological and scientific quality, in addition to identifying topics and areas of special interest.

Identifiers

PMID39433767
PMCPMC11494059

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.