ArticleScientific reports2024
Association between RBC folate and diabetic nephropathy in Type2 diabetes mellitus patients: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Causal insights into major risk factors for diabetic kidney disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization study.Renal failure · 2025Pooled it
- Association Between Serum Folic Acid Levels and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Overweight or Obese Patients: A Retrospective Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Folates play a crucial role as cofactors in metabolic pathways, influencing biological methylation and nucleotide synthesis, which has a significant impact on overall health and disease susceptibility. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a prevalent and severe complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). The correlation between RBC folate and DN remains unclear currently. This study aims to assess whether RBC folate is associated with DN. Based on data from the NHANES (2011-2018), we conducted a cross-sectional study involving 3070 adults with type 2 DM (T2DM). Demographic factors, levels of folate and vitamin B12, dietary folate intakes, and relevant laboratory data were obtained from all participants. Logistic regression, fitting smooth curves, interaction effects were utilized to support the research objectives. Regression analyses demonstrated a positive relation between RBC folate and DN. (P < 0.001). A positive association between levels of RBC folate and the risk of DN was observed after full adjustment for all the confounding variables (odds ratio: 1.38, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-1.49, P < 0.001). Similar patterns of association were observed for subgroup analysis (all P values for interaction > 0.05). In addition, curve fitting after adjusting for all the confounding variables demonstrated that there was a linear relationship between RBC folate and DN (P for non-linearity = 0.147). Increased RBC folate levels were linked to a higher risk of DN in type 2 diabetes. RBC folate should be considered as a crucial indicator for folate status in DN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.