Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433838›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A causal role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in random exploration.

Armin Toghi, Mojtaba Chizari, Reza Khosrowabadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Armin ToghiInstitute for Cognitive and Brain Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Mojtaba ChizariInstitute for Cognitive and Brain Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Reza KhosrowabadiInstitute for Cognitive and Brain Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. r_khosroabadi@sbu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6282-9389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision to explore new options with uncertain outcomes or exploit familiar options with known outcomes is a fundamental challenge that the brain faces in almost all real-life decisions. Previous studies have shown that humans use two main explorative strategies to negotiate this explore-exploit tradeoff. Exploring for the sake of information is called directed exploration, and exploration driven by behavioral variability is known as random exploration. While previous neuroimaging studies have shown different neural correlates for these explorative strategies, including right frontopolar cortex (FPC), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), there is still a lack of causal evidence for most of these brain regions. Here, we focused on the right DLPFC, which was previously supported to be involved in exploration. Using the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and Horizon task on twenty-five healthy right-handed adult participants, we showed that inhibiting rDLPFC did not change directed exploration but selectively reduced random exploration, by increasing reward sensitivity over the average reward of each option. This suggests a causal role for rDLPFC in random exploration, and further supports dissociable neural implementations for these two explorative strategies.

Indexed as

Dorsolateral Prefrontal CortexAdultBrain MappingDecision MakingExploratory BehaviorFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexRewardTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39433838
PMCPMC11493979

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.