Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433943›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparative analysis of SARC-F-EBM, Ishii test, and six other screening tools for sarcopenia in Chinese community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional diagnostic study.

Qian Guo, Qifeng Chen, Kangkang Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qian GuoHospital-Acquired Infection Control Department, Shaoxing Seventh People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Qifeng ChenDepartment of Non-communicable Diseases Control and Prevention, Shaoxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shaoxing, China.
Kangkang ChenDepartment of Non-communicable Diseases Control and Prevention, Shaoxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shaoxing, China. sxcdc_ck@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the relative performance of simple screening methods for sarcopenia in Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Data of older adults aged ≥ 60 were collected through a cross-sectional investigation. Sarcopenia was defined according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria. The accuracy of screening methods was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curves (AUC). The AUC value greater than 0.8 represented the good screening ability. A total of 918 older adults (44.3% men, mean age 70.4 ± 6.5 years) were included in this study. The overall prevalence rates of possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia were 59.5%, 12.8%, and 5.9%, respectively. In men, the SARC-F-EBM and Ishii tests indicated good screening capabilities for confirmed sarcopenia, with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.84), respectively. In women, the highest AUC was also achieved using the SARC-F-EBM at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82), followed by the Ishii test at 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81), showing the moderate efficacy. A ranking diagram showed that SARC-F-EBM was most likely to be considered the best method for diagnosing sarcopenia in terms of AUC and sensitivity, regardless of sex. We recommend the SARC-F-EBM for sarcopenia screening in community-dwelling Chinese older adults when respondents are able to answer the questionnaire accurately; otherwise, the Ishii test consisting entirely of objective measures could be used.

Indexed as

SarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrevalenceROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityCommunityOlder adultsROC analysisSarcopeniaScreening

Identifiers

PMID39433943
PMCPMC11494060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.