Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434504›Full record

ArticlePain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2025

Safety and efficacy of long-term use of a buprenorphine transdermal patch system in patients with osteoarthritis and low back pain refractory to non-opioid analgesics: Post-marketing surveillance of 3000 cases.

Takahiro Ushida, Rumiko Kanzaki, Keishi Katayama, Akito Ishikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Takahiro UshidaAichi Medical University, Nagakute-shi, Aichi, Japan.
Rumiko KanzakiScientific Affairs Division, Mundipharma K.K., Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Keishi KatayamaScientific Affairs Division, Mundipharma K.K., Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5997-3404
Akito IshikawaScientific Affairs Division, Mundipharma K.K., Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Mundipharma Japanese subsidiary of Mundipharma research limited
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA post-marketing surveillance was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the buprenorphine transdermal patch under actual clinical practice.

resultsOf the 3017 patients included in the safety analysis, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were observed in 1524 (50.5%), the most common being nausea, skin symptoms at the site of application, constipation, and vomiting. The incidences of respiratory depression and withdrawal symptoms were low, and no drug dependence was observed. Among the 2573 patients included in the efficacy analysis, the efficacy (≥2-point improvement in the numerical rating scale) rate was 74.4%, which was significantly higher in older adults (≥65 y.o) than in younger adults. Discontinuation was mostly caused by ADRs during the early initiation phase.

conclusionThis study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of long-term administration of buprenorphine transdermal patches, suggesting that pain control is possible over the long term if attention is paid to ADRs in the early stages of administration.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineLow Back PainOsteoarthritisProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingTransdermal PatchAdministration, CutaneousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphinebuprenorphine transdermal patch systemchronic painpost‐marketing surveillance

Identifiers

PMID39434504
PMCPMC11683516

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.