Evidence mapPaperPMID 39435658Full record

ArticleJCI insight2024

Antibody levels versus vaccination status in the outcome of older adults with COVID-19.

Sylvia Mink, Christoph H Saely, Andreas Leiherer, Patrick Reimann, Matthias Frick, Janne Cadamuro, Wolfgang Hitzl, Heinz Drexel, Peter Fraunberger

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sylvia MinkCentral Medical Laboratories, Feldkirch, Austria.
Christoph H SaelyPrivate University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Principality of Liechtenstein.
Andreas LeihererCentral Medical Laboratories, Feldkirch, Austria.
Patrick ReimannPrivate University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Principality of Liechtenstein.
Matthias FrickDepartment of Internal Medicine, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Janne CadamuroDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Wolfgang HitzlDepartment of Research and Innovation, Team Biostatistics and Publication of Clinical Trials, Paracelsus, Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Heinz DrexelPrivate University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Principality of Liechtenstein.
Peter FraunbergerCentral Medical Laboratories, Feldkirch, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDDespite the currently prevailing, milder Omicron variant of COVID-19, older adults remain at elevated risk of hospital admission, critical illness, and death. Loss of efficacy of the immune system, including reduced strength, quality, and durability of antibody responses, may render generalized recommendations on booster vaccinations inadequate. There is a lack of data on the efficacy of antibody levels in older adults and on the utility of vaccination status versus antibody levels as a correlate of protection. It is further unclear whether antibody levels may be used to guide the timing of booster vaccinations in older adults.METHODSWe conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study comprising hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies were measured on hospital admission. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Patients were stratified by age, antibody levels, and vaccination status. Multiple logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were conducted.RESULTSIn total, 785 older patients (≥60 years of age [a]) and 367 controls (<60a) were included. After adjusting for confounders, risk of mortality, ICU admission, endotracheal intubation, and oxygen administration was 4.9, 2.6, 6.5, and 2.3 times higher, respectively, if antibody levels were < 1,200 BAU/mL (aOR, 4.92 [95%CI, 2.59-9.34], P < 0.0001; aOR, 2.64 [95%CI, 1.52-4.62], P = 0.0006; aOR, 6.50 [95%CI, 1.48-28.47], P = 0.013; aOR, 2.34 [95%CI, 1.60-3.343], P < 0.0001). Older adults infected with the Omicron variant were approximately 6 times more likely to die if antibody levels were < 1,200 BAU/mL (aOR, 6.3 [95% CI, 2.43-16.40], P = 0.0002).CONCLUSIONAntibody levels were a stronger predictor of in-hospital mortality than vaccination status. Monitoring antibody levels may constitute a better and more direct approach for safeguarding older adults from adverse COVID-19 outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansImmunization, SecondaryMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusClinical practiceInfectious diseaseVaccines

Identifiers

PMID39435658
PMCPMC11529978

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.