ArticleRenal failure2024
Multimodal ultrasound deep learning to detect fibrosis in early chronic kidney disease.
Article in Renal failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of AI-augmented renal ultrasound for degenerative kidney disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Future science OA · 2026Review
- Monitoring vascular changes in renal fibrosis in mice using multimodal optical and ultrasonic imaging.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Applications of Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Evidence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in abdominal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of multi-center serum creatinine-based models for noninvasive prediction of kidney fibrosis in chronic kidney disease.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Non-invasive assessment techniques for renal fibrosis: advances and perspectives.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Sound touch viscosity imaging for chronic kidney disease staging: a novel biomarker for renal fibrosis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Deep learning framework for automated frame selection in kidney ultrasound.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of Seven Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Prediction Models for Renal Fibrosis in Chronic Kidney Disease Using Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation and Ultrasound Radiomics.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Advancements in the non-invasive diagnosis of renal fibrosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed a multimodal ultrasound (US) deep learning (DL) fusion model to automatically classify early fibrosis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This prospective study included patients with CKD who underwent continuous gray-scale US, superb microvascular imaging, and strain elastography from May to November 2022. According to the pathological tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis score, patients were divided into minimal and mild groups (affected area ≤10% and 11 - 25% of the total cortical volume, respectively). The dataset was divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. A DL model combining the features of the three US modes was developed to predict early fibrosis in patients with CKD. We compared these findings with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the clinical model by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curve in the test set. The AUC of single-mode DL based on gray-scale US, superb microvascular imaging, and strain elastography was 0.682, 0.745, and 0.648, respectively, while that of the multimodal US DL model was 0.86. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of the multimodal US DL model were 0.779, 0.767, and 0.796, respectively, and the negative and positive predictive values were 0.842 and 0.706, respectively. The AUC of the multimodal US DL model was significantly better than that of the single-mode DL and clinical models. The DL algorithm developed using multimodal US images can effectively predict early fibrosis in patients with CKD with significantly greater accuracy than single-mode DL or clinical models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.