ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Emergent cesarean section during active labor-does cervical dilatation matter?
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The use of a Fetal Pillow device at full-dilation cesarean delivery-maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the immediate and late complications associated with emergent cesarean sections (CS) performed during the first and second stages of active labor.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from a single academic center, including data from 577 patients who underwent emergent cesarean sections at 4 cm or more of cervical dilatation. Patients were divided into two groups: those who had CS during the first stage of labor (4-9 cm dilatation) and those who had CS at complete dilatation (10 cm). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared, including rates of complications such as uterine atony, post-partum hemorrhage, infection, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.
resultsOf the 577 patients, 352 underwent CS during active labor and 255 at complete dilatation. The complete dilatation group exhibited significantly higher rates of uterine atony (19.6% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.009) and uterine incision extension (34.2% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.0001). In addition, they had longer hospital stays (4.8 vs. 4.25 days, p = 0.003) and higher outpatient clinic visit rates (21.3% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.0001). Infection-related complications on readmission were more common in the complete dilatation group (20% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.001). Neonatal outcomes, including APGAR scores and NICU admissions, did not differ significantly between the groups.
conclusionEmergent cesarean sections performed at complete cervical dilatation are associated with increased intra-operative and post-operative complications compared to those performed during active labor. These findings highlight the importance of considering the stage of labor when planning cesarean delivery to minimize risks and optimize outcomes for both mother and neonate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39436416What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.