ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
Association between antithrombotic agents use and hepatocellular carcinoma risk: a two-sample mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk insights for clinical medication: a Mendelian randomization study of 23 drugs and lung cancer.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Causal effects of drug exposure on gastric cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study involving 23 commonly used medications in the European population.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer worldwide. Multiple observational studies demonstrated a negative association between the use of antithrombotic agents and the risk of HCC. However, the precise causal relationship between these factors remains uncertain. Therefore, our study used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to assess the causal link between these two factors.
methodThe summary statistics of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the use of antithrombotic agents were acquired from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) performed on individuals of European descent. A two-sample MR analysis was performed using the inverse variance weighting (IVW), the weighted median estimate, the MR-Egger regression, and the weighted-mode estimate. Sensitivity analysis of the primary findings was performed using MR-PRESSO, MR-Egger regression, Cochran's Q test, and Leave-one-out analysis.
resultsTen SNPs associated with the use of antithrombotic agents were selected as instrumental variables. The MR analysis performed using the four methods mentioned above revealed a negative causal association between the use of antithrombotic agents and HCC. Univariate MR estimates based on the inverse variance weighting (IVW) method suggested a negative causal association between the use of antithrombotic agents and HCC [odds ratio (OR) 0.444, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.279 to 0.707, P = 0.001]. The other methods also produced similar results. No heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were found.
conclusionOur findings suggested an inverse causal association of antithrombotic agents with the risk of HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.