Evidence mapPaperPMID 39436645Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Cardiovascular Risk Scores and Migraine Status.

Linda Al-Hassany, Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink, Tobias Kurth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linda Al-HassanyDivision of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrinkDivision of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Tobias KurthInstitute of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A previous cohort study in the US found that women with higher cardiovascular risk were more likely to have a history of migraine but less likely to have active migraine. Extrapolating these results to men and European individuals is crucial to understanding the complex association between migraine activity status and vascular health in other populations. Objective: To evaluate the association pattern between a cardiovascular risk score, the most recent European version of the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) risk estimation system, and migraine activity status in Dutch men and women. Design, Setting, and Participants: The prospective population-based Lifelines cohort consists of community-dwelling adults residing in the northern part of the Netherlands. Individuals with a terminal illness, incapacitated individuals, including those with a severe mental illness, or who were unable to visit their general practitioner or complete the questionnaires were excluded from participation within Lifelines. Participants whose data on the cardiovascular risk scores and migraine status were complete were included in the analysis. Data on baseline characteristics were collected between November 1, 2006, to December 31, 2014. Cross-sectional and follow-up analyses were conducted within the prospective cohort. Questionnaires were sent approximately every 1.5 to 2.5 years, and the last self-reported migraine assessment took place between October 1, 2019, and January 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2022, to August 16, 2024. Exposures: The SCORE2 is a sex-specific European cardiovascular risk score that includes age, cholesterol levels, smoking status, diabetes, and systolic blood pressure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the association pattern between cardiovascular risk scores and migraine activity status. SCORE2 risk scores were measured once at baseline; groups of the SCORE2 (<1.0%, 1.0% to <2.5%, 2.5% to <5.0%, 5.0% to <7.5%, 7.5% to <10.0%, and ≥10.0%) were created based on the sum of points of individual risk factors. Migraine activity status was assessed using self-reported questionnaires and classified as (1) prevalent (ie, migraine at baseline), (2) incident (ie, no migraine at baseline but migraine in ≥1 follow-up), and (3) none. To evaluate the influence of age, we conducted stratified analyses of the SCORE2 by age categories (<40, 40-49, and ≥50 years). Results: The total study population consisted of 140 915 individuals at baseline with a mean (SD) age of 44.4 (12.7) years, of whom 58.5% were women. In total, 25 915 individuals (18.4% of the total population) had prevalent migraine and 2224 (1.9% of the 115 000 without prevalent migraine) had incident migraine. The odds of having prevalent and incident migraine, compared with individuals with a SCORE2 category of less than 1.0%, varied and decreased with increasing SCORE2 categories, with odds ratios (ORs) for prevalent migraine ranging from 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96) for a SCORE2 category of 1.0% to less than 2.5% to 0.43 (95% CI, 0.39-0.48) for a SCORE2 category of at least 10.0% and, for incident migraine, from 0.63 (95% CI, 0.57-0.69) for a SCORE2 category of 1.0% to less than 2.5% to 0.17 (95% CI, 0.10-0.27) for a SCORE2 category of at least 10.0%. A similar pattern was observed in both sexes but more profound in women. In women, ORs for prevalent migraine ranged from 1.21 (95% CI, 1.16-1.25) to 0.70 (95% CI, 0.58-0.83) (vs 1.19 [95% CI, 1.09-1.29] to 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72-0.99] in men) and, for incident migraine, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64-0.80) to 0.20 (95% CI, 0.07-0.43) (vs 1.18 [95% CI, 0.92-1.52] to 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22-0.78] in men). Models with incident migraine as the outcome showed lower ORs across the ascending cardiovascular risk score categories. Age stratification suggested that the association between cardiovascular risk scores and migraine activity status were unlikely to be strongly influenced by age. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of community-dwelling Dutch adults, the odds of having prevalent or incident migraine decreased with increasing cardiovascular risk score categories. These results support the hypothesis that a relatively healthy cardiovascular system increases the probability of having active or developing migraine in the future, especially among women. Sex differences might play a pathophysiological role in the association between migraine activity and vascular health.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHeart Disease Risk FactorsMigraine DisordersAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39436645
PMCPMC11581481

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.