ArticleJAMA network open2024
Cardiovascular Risk Scores and Migraine Status.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trigeminovascular calcitonin gene-related peptide release and peripheral vascular responses in a mouse model of accelerated aging: Implications for migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Migraine and Cardiovascular Risk: A Scoping Review of Vascular Outcomes, Risk Assessment, and Endothelial Dysfunction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Decoding the lipid-migraine link: a genetic and lipidomic investigation of migraine subtypes.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- Tinnitus constancy and self-reported severe headache or migraine symptoms in peri- and postmenopausal women: a statistical modeling and machine learning analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Observational
- Premature ventricular complexes and migraine: insights from Holter monitoring during pain-free intervals.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Observational
- From Headache to Heart Health: Investigating the Migraine-Cardiovascular Disease Connection.Neurology and therapy · 2025Review
- Concomitant anti-CGRP and immunomodulatory treatments in patients with migraine: towards integrated management strategies.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Migraine with and without aura-two distinct entities? A narrative review.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: A previous cohort study in the US found that women with higher cardiovascular risk were more likely to have a history of migraine but less likely to have active migraine. Extrapolating these results to men and European individuals is crucial to understanding the complex association between migraine activity status and vascular health in other populations. Objective: To evaluate the association pattern between a cardiovascular risk score, the most recent European version of the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) risk estimation system, and migraine activity status in Dutch men and women. Design, Setting, and Participants: The prospective population-based Lifelines cohort consists of community-dwelling adults residing in the northern part of the Netherlands. Individuals with a terminal illness, incapacitated individuals, including those with a severe mental illness, or who were unable to visit their general practitioner or complete the questionnaires were excluded from participation within Lifelines. Participants whose data on the cardiovascular risk scores and migraine status were complete were included in the analysis. Data on baseline characteristics were collected between November 1, 2006, to December 31, 2014. Cross-sectional and follow-up analyses were conducted within the prospective cohort. Questionnaires were sent approximately every 1.5 to 2.5 years, and the last self-reported migraine assessment took place between October 1, 2019, and January 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2022, to August 16, 2024. Exposures: The SCORE2 is a sex-specific European cardiovascular risk score that includes age, cholesterol levels, smoking status, diabetes, and systolic blood pressure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the association pattern between cardiovascular risk scores and migraine activity status. SCORE2 risk scores were measured once at baseline; groups of the SCORE2 (<1.0%, 1.0% to <2.5%, 2.5% to <5.0%, 5.0% to <7.5%, 7.5% to <10.0%, and ≥10.0%) were created based on the sum of points of individual risk factors. Migraine activity status was assessed using self-reported questionnaires and classified as (1) prevalent (ie, migraine at baseline), (2) incident (ie, no migraine at baseline but migraine in ≥1 follow-up), and (3) none. To evaluate the influence of age, we conducted stratified analyses of the SCORE2 by age categories (<40, 40-49, and ≥50 years). Results: The total study population consisted of 140 915 individuals at baseline with a mean (SD) age of 44.4 (12.7) years, of whom 58.5% were women. In total, 25 915 individuals (18.4% of the total population) had prevalent migraine and 2224 (1.9% of the 115 000 without prevalent migraine) had incident migraine. The odds of having prevalent and incident migraine, compared with individuals with a SCORE2 category of less than 1.0%, varied and decreased with increasing SCORE2 categories, with odds ratios (ORs) for prevalent migraine ranging from 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96) for a SCORE2 category of 1.0% to less than 2.5% to 0.43 (95% CI, 0.39-0.48) for a SCORE2 category of at least 10.0% and, for incident migraine, from 0.63 (95% CI, 0.57-0.69) for a SCORE2 category of 1.0% to less than 2.5% to 0.17 (95% CI, 0.10-0.27) for a SCORE2 category of at least 10.0%. A similar pattern was observed in both sexes but more profound in women. In women, ORs for prevalent migraine ranged from 1.21 (95% CI, 1.16-1.25) to 0.70 (95% CI, 0.58-0.83) (vs 1.19 [95% CI, 1.09-1.29] to 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72-0.99] in men) and, for incident migraine, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64-0.80) to 0.20 (95% CI, 0.07-0.43) (vs 1.18 [95% CI, 0.92-1.52] to 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22-0.78] in men). Models with incident migraine as the outcome showed lower ORs across the ascending cardiovascular risk score categories. Age stratification suggested that the association between cardiovascular risk scores and migraine activity status were unlikely to be strongly influenced by age. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of community-dwelling Dutch adults, the odds of having prevalent or incident migraine decreased with increasing cardiovascular risk score categories. These results support the hypothesis that a relatively healthy cardiovascular system increases the probability of having active or developing migraine in the future, especially among women. Sex differences might play a pathophysiological role in the association between migraine activity and vascular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.