ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Three-dimensional isotropic imaging of live suspension cells enabled by droplet microvortices.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear mechanotransduction: tools for mechanical perturbation and chromatin characterization.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2026Review
- Optical tweeze-sectioning microscopy for 3D imaging and manipulation of suspended cells.Science advances · 2025Article
- Article
- The potential of microfluidic cell analysis in CAR T cell therapy manufacturing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional isotropic imaging of live suspension cells enabled by droplet microvortices.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fast, nondestructive three-dimensional (3D) imaging of live suspension cells remains challenging without substrate treatment or fixation, precluding scalable single-cell morphometry with minimal alterations. While optical sectioning techniques achieve 3D live cell imaging, lateral versus depth resolution differences further complicate analysis. We present a scalable microfluidic method capable of 3D fluorescent isotropic imaging of live, nonadherent cells suspended inside picoliter droplets with high-speed single-cell volumetric readout (800 to 1,200 slices in 5 to 8 s) and near-diffraction limit resolution (~216 nm). The platform features a droplet trap array that leverages flow-induced droplet interfacial shear to generate intradroplet microvortices, which rotate single cells on their axis to enable optical projection tomography (OPT)-based imaging. This allows gentle (~1 mPa shear stress) observation of cells encapsulated inside nontoxic isotonic buffer droplets, facilitating scalable OPT acquisition by simultaneous spinning of hundreds of cells. We demonstrate 3D imaging of live myeloid and lymphoid cells in suspension, including K562 cells, as well as naive and activated T cells-small cells prone to movement in their suspended phenotype. Our fully suspended, orientation-independent cell morphometry, driven by isotropic imaging and spherical harmonic analysis, enabled the study of primary T cells across various immunological activation states. This approach unveiled six distinct nuclear content distributions, contrasting with conventional 2D images that typically portray spheroid and bean-like nuclear shapes associated with lymphocytes. Our arrayed-droplet OPT technology is capable of isotropic, single live-cell 3D imaging, with the potential to perform large-scale morphometry of immune cell effector function states while providing compatibility with microfluidic droplet operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.