ArticlePloS one2024
A novel dual probe-based method for mutation detection using isothermal amplification.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single Isothermal Assay for Multi-Site Mutation Detection of Rifampicin Resistance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Correction: A novel dual probe-based method for mutation detection using isothermal amplification.PloS one · 2026Article
- Genotypic and phenotypic strategies to detect antibiotic resistance in foodborne pathogens along the food processing chain.Current research in food science · 2026Review
- Development of SNP-LAMP Combined with Lateral Flow Dipstick to Detect the S531LDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A new approach for the detection of genetic alterations utilizing modified loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction (LAMP).Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cost efficient and rapid detection tools to detect mutations especially those linked to drug-resistance are important to address concerns of the rising multi-drug resistance infections. Here we integrated dual probes, namely a calibrator probe and an indicator probe, into isothermal amplification detection system. These two probes are designed to bind distinct regions on the same amplicon to determine the presence or absence of mutation. The calibrator probe signal is used as an internal signal calibrator for indicator probe which detects the presence or absence of the mutation. As an illustrative example, we evaluated the applicability of this dual probe method for detecting mutations associated with rifampicin (RIF) drug resistance at codons 516, 526 and 531 of the rpoB gene in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In this assessment, we examined 127 artificial samples comprising wild types and mutants with single or multiple mutations. Our results demonstrated 100% accuracy for both wild types and mutants for mutations at codons 526 and 531. As regards to mutations at codon 516, the wild type was identified with 100% accuracy, while the mutants were identified with 95% accuracy. Moreover, when we extended our evaluation to include clinical MTB strains and the Zeptometrix MTB Verification panel, our method achieved 100% accuracy (5 out of 5) in identifying wild-type strains. Additionally, we successfully detected a RIF-resistant strain with mutations at codon 531 of the rpoB gene in Zeptometrix verification panel. Our isothermal mutation detection system, relying on dual probes exhibits a versatile approach. With the capability to identify mutations without prior knowledge of their specific mutation direction, our dual-probe method shows significant promise for applications in drug resistance nucleic acid testing, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.