ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2024
Appraisal of partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage through a lumped-parameter mathematical model: a new pathophysiological proof of concept.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analytical interpretation of hemodynamic data in patients with intracardiac shunts: Role of mathematical modeling.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHaemodynamic determinants of the ratio between pulmonary and systemic flow (Qp/Qs) in partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (PAPVR) are still not fully understood. Indeed, among patients with the same number of lung segments draining anomalously, a great variability is observed in terms of right ventricular overload. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the anatomic site of drainage, affecting the total circuit impedance, independently influences the magnitude of shunt estimated by Qp/Qs. A zero-dimensional lumped parameter mathematical model was developed and validated on a sample of patients.
methodsWe developed a zero-dimensional lumped parameter model, using time-varying elastances for heart chambers, RLC Windkessel circuits for the systemic and pulmonary circulations. Patients were categorized into vena cava (VC) type (including left drainage to anomalous vein) and right atrium (RA) type. The mathematical model is a system of ordinary differential equations that are numerically solved by means of the ode15s solver in the MATLAB environment.
resultsThe model showed an increase of Qp/Qs with the increase of the number of anomalous veins. With the same number of anomalous veins, Qp/Qs was lower in patients with anomalous drainage to the VC as compared with RA. The validation sample consisted of 49 patients (27, 55% females). As predicted by the model, patients with PAPVR with VC type displayed a lower invasive and cardiac magnetic resonance Qp/Qs as compared with drainage to RA: 1.4 (1.2-1.7) and 1.45 (1.25-1.6) versus 2 (1.75-2.1) and 1.9 (1.6-2), P < 0.05. After stratifying for number of lung territories, a lower Qp/Qs was measured in patients with VC PAPVR as compared with RA.
conclusionsIn patients with PAPVR, the site of anomalous drainage modulates the Qp/Qs. According to the model, this effect is mediated by the post-capillary impedance of the circuit and significantly decreases with the increase of pulmonary vascular resistances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.