ReviewVox sanguinis2025
Quality of life in people with sickle cell disease treated with automated red blood cell exchange.
Review in Vox sanguinis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Isovolemic Hemodilution-Red Cell Exchange on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Article
- CRISPR and Fanzor in sickle cell disease: current progress and future prospects.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Article
- Quality of life in people with sickle cell disease treated with automated red blood cell exchange.Vox sanguinis · 2025Review
- The role of neuroendocrine differentiation in treatment resistance of prostate cancer and intervention strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThis review aims to explore the impact of sickle cell disease (SCD) on patients' quality of life (QoL) and the effectiveness of different transfusion modalities, particularly automated red blood cell exchange (aRBCX), in managing the factors that impact QoL. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic search was performed in PubMed to retrieve articles with data on QoL in SCD patients treated with aRBCX during the last 20 years. A targeted search for medical guidelines and a free search were added.
resultsWhen assessing the impact of the transfusion modality on the QoL of patients with SCD, some studies indicated an improvement in health-related QoL when using aRBCX while others reported no differences. The benefits of aRBCX include a decrease in length of hospital stay, pain-related hospitalizations and procedure time. The drawbacks of aRBCX were also identified, including an increased number of procedure-related complications (despite the overall number of complications showing no significant differences) and a more complex vascular access. Chronic red blood cell exchange favours psychosocial factors such as anxiety and social functioning, but the impact of using aRBCX in these parameters is not determined yet.
conclusionaRBCX, known to be an efficient procedure to manage SCD, appears to be promising in improving patients' QoL. However, more comprehensive studies incorporating patient-reported outcomes are needed to fully understand the impact of different transfusion modalities on QoL in SCD patients. An integrated care approach, including psychological support and pain management, may further enhance QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.