ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2024
Multimorbidity and person-centred care in a socioeconomically deprived community: a qualitative study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking care for multiple long term conditions: beyond guidelines for single diseases.BMJ medicine · 2026Article
- Meaningful community engagement: a Deep End perspective.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Exploring the lived experience for the most vulnerable.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
- A limited view of socioeconomically deprived communities.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with multimorbidity (>2 long-term conditions) have poorer outcomes in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation (SED). High-quality person-centred care (PCC) is important in those with multimorbidity, but socially vulnerable populations have not, to our knowledge, informed current PCC models.
aimTo explore how wider community factors influence management of multimorbidity in the context of high SED, how high-quality PCC is defined by patients, and whether this influences healthcare management. DESIGN AND
settingEthnographically informed case study in a community experiencing high SED in Scotland.
methodParticipant observation (138 h) was undertaken within four community groups who also took part in two participatory workshops. There were 25 in-depth interviews with people with multimorbidity, recruited from local general practices; emerging findings were discussed with interviewees in one focus group. Field notes/transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsKey aspects of PCC were 'patient as person', 'strong therapeutic relationship', 'coordination of care', and 'power sharing'; power sharing was particularly enabling but rarely happened (barriers often unseen by practitioners). Shared community experiences of 'being known', 'stigma', and 'none of the systems working' influenced how people approached health services and healthcare decisions. High-quality PCC may have been particularly effective in this setting because of its influence on ameliorating wider shared negative community experiences.
conclusionIn a high SED setting PCC is important and can enhance engagement. Wider community factors have a critical influence on engagement with health care in areas of high SED and PCC may be particularly important in this context because of its influence ameliorating these. Policymakers should prioritise and resource PCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.