Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438199›Full record

ReviewTrends in molecular medicine2025

Targeting monoamine oxidases in cancer: advances and opportunities.

Jing Wei, Boyang Jason Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jing WeiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99223, USA.
Boyang Jason WuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99223, USA. Electronic address: boyang.wu@wsu.edu.

Funding

MAOA and AR Reciprocal Crosstalk in Prostate CancerR37CA233658 · NCI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WU, BOYANG · 2019 to 2025
$2.4M
Elucidating the Role of Tryptophan Hydroxylase 1 in Neuroendocrine Prostate CancerR01CA279528 · NCI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Boyang Wu · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
Deciphering Mechanisms of Tumor-Stromal Interactions in Prostate CancerR01CA258634 · NCI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WU, BOYANG · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258634NCI NIH HHS R01 CA279528NCI NIH HHS R37 CA233658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoamine oxidases (MAOs) are a crucial pair of isoenzymes responsible for degrading monoamine neurotransmitters and dietary amines. In addition to extensive studies of their roles in the context of brain functions and disorders over decades, emerging evidence indicates that MAOs are also often dysregulated and associated with clinical outcomes in diverse cancers, with the ability to differentially regulate cancer growth, invasion, metastasis, progression, and therapy response depending on the cancer type. In this review, we summarize recent advances in understanding the clinical relevance, functional importance, and mechanisms of MAOs in a broad range of cancers, and discuss the application and therapeutic benefit of MAO inhibitors (MAOIs) for cancer treatment, highlighting the roles of MAOs as novel regulators, prognostic biomarkers, and therapeutic targets in cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsMonoamine OxidaseMonoamine Oxidase InhibitorsNeoplasmsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorMonoamine OxidaseMonoamine Oxidase Inhibitorsbiomarkercancercancer therapymonoamine oxidasemonoamine oxidase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID39438199
PMCPMC12010012

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.