Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438248›Full record

ReviewBiomacromolecules2024

Progress in Multiscale Modeling of Silk Materials.

Harry D A Brough, David Cheneler, John G Hardy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomacromolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harry D A BroughDepartment of Chemistry, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom.
David ChenelerSchool of Engineering, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1353-0329
John G HardyDepartment of Chemistry, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0655-2167

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a result of their hierarchical structure and biological processing, silk fibers rank among nature's most remarkable materials. The biocompatibility of silk-based materials and the exceptional mechanical properties of certain fibers has inspired the use of silk in numerous technical and medical applications. In recent years, computational modeling has clarified the relationship between the molecular architecture and emergent properties of silk fibers and has demonstrated predictive power in studies on novel biomaterials. Here, we review advances in modeling the structure and properties of natural and synthetic silk-based materials, from early structural studies of silkworm cocoon fibers to cutting-edge atomistic simulations of spider silk nanofibrils and the recent use of machine learning models. We explore applications of modeling across length scales: from quantum mechanical studies on model peptides, to atomistic and coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of silk proteins, to finite element analysis of spider webs. As computational power and algorithmic efficiency continue to advance, we expect multiscale modeling to become an indispensable tool for understanding nature's most impressive fibers and developing bioinspired functional materials.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationSilkAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBombyxFibroinsMachine LearningSpidersBiocompatible MaterialsFibroinsSilk

Identifiers

PMID39438248
PMCPMC11558682

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.