ArticleScientific reports2024
An enhanced deep learning method for the quantification of epicardial adipose tissue.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of systemic and epicardial adipose tissue in cardiometabolic disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- AI in Adipose Imaging: Revolutionizing Visceral Adipose Tissue, Ectopic Fat, and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Epicardial Adipose Tissue Volume Assessment in the General Population and CAD-RADS 2.0 Score Correlation Using Dual Source Cardiac CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Can AI Capture and Quantify Clinical Expertise? Implications for Intracoronary Imaging in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) significantly contributes to the progression of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, manually quantifying EAT volume is labor-intensive and susceptible to human error. Although there have been some deep learning-based methods for automatic quantification of EAT, they are mostly uninterpretable and fail to harness the complete anatomical characteristics. In this study, we proposed an enhanced deep learning method designed for EAT quantification on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) scan, which integrated both data-driven method and specific morphological information. A total of 108 patients who underwent routine CCTA examinations were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to training set (n = 60), validation set (n = 8), and test set (n = 40). We quantified and calculated the EAT volume based on the CT attenuation values within the predicted pericardium. The automatic method demonstrated strong agreement with expert manual quantification, yielding a median Dice score coefficients (DSC) of 0.916 (Interquartile Range (IQR): 0.846-0.948) for 2D slices. Meanwhile, the median DSC for the 3D volume was 0.896 (IQR: 0.874-0.908) between these two measures, with an excellent correlation of 0.980 (p < 0.001) for EAT volumes. Additionally, our model's Bland-Altman analysis revealed a low bias of -2.39 cm³. The incorporation of pericardial anatomical structures into deep learning methods can effectively enhance the automatic quantification of EAT. The promising results demonstrate its potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.