Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438585›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The association between the non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in US adults: a cross-sectional study.

XuDong Huang, Jing Li, LiFeng Zhang, ChenYang Zhang, ChenYang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Determinants of Liver Steatosis Progression in Chinese Children: A Prospective Cohort Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

XuDong HuangDepartment of Science and Education, Shenyang Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shenyang, 110014, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Science and Education, Shenyang Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shenyang, 110014, China.
LiFeng ZhangDepartment of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, 110034, China.
ChenYang ZhangDepartment of Science and Education, Shenyang Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shenyang, 110014, China.
ChenYang LiDepartment of Science and Education, Shenyang Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shenyang, 110014, China. chenyang_li@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ratio of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) to HDL-C (NHHR) is a novel lipid parameter used to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between the NHHR and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Owing to the lack of research exploring this relationship in specific populations, this study aimed to determine the potential link between the NHHR and risk of NAFLD among American adults in the United States. Data were retrieved from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 2017-2020. After excluding individuals with other liver diseases, alcohol abuse, and missing lipid data, a total of 6809 eligible adults were included for analysis. The NHHR was calculated as the ratio of (non-HDL-C) to HDL-C, while NAFLD was identified by liver steatosis detected by transient elastography. Multivariable weighted logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) models were employed to investigate the relationship between the NHHR and risk of NAFLD. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also conducted to test the robustness of the results. As the NHHR increased, the prevalence of NAFLD rose progressively (5.88% vs. 8.75% vs. 12.24% vs. 15.77%, p < 0.001). In the overall population, after adjusting for confounding factors, each unit increase in the NHHR was associated with a 25% increase in NAFLD risk (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.53, p = 0.0372). When the NHHR was analyzed as a categorical variable (quartiles), participants in the highest quartile had a significantly higher risk of NAFLD than those in the lowest quartile (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.75-3.85, p = 0.009). RCS analysis further indicated a nonlinear dose-response relationship between the NHHR and risk of NAFLD (p non-linearity < 0.0001). This association remained significant in both subgroup and sensitivity analyses. This study confirmed that the NHHR, particularly at higher levels, was an independent risk factor for NAFLD. As a comprehensive lipid indicator, the NHHR had the potential to predict NAFLD risk. These findings provided new insights for the prevention and clinical management of NAFLD.

Indexed as

Cholesterol, HDLNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseNutrition SurveysAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesCholesterol, HDLCross-sectional study interestsNon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseNon-high-density lipoprotein cholesterolNon-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio

Identifiers

PMID39438585
PMCPMC11496614

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.