ArticleScientific reports2024
Precision phenotyping from routine laboratory parameters for out of hospital survival prediction in an all comers prospective PCI registry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Out-of-hospital mortality in coronary artery disease (CAD) is particularly high and established adverse event prediction tools are yet to be available. Our study aimed to investigate whether precision phenotyping can be performed using routine laboratory parameters for the prediction of out-of-hospital survival in a CAD population treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). All patients treated by PCI and discharged alive in a tertiary center between January 2016 - December 2022 that have been included prospectively in the local registry were analyzed. 115 parameters from the PCI registry and 266 parameters derived from routine laboratory testing were used. An extreme gradient-boosted decision tree machine learning (ML) algorithm was trained and used to predict all-cause and cardiovascular-cause survival. A total of 4027 patients with 4981 PCI hospitalizations were randomly included in the 70% training dataset and 1729 patients with 2160 PCI hospitalizations were randomly included in the 30% validation dataset. All-cause and cardiovascular cause mortality was 17.5% and 12.2%. The integrated area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular cause mortality by the ML on the validation dataset was 0.844 and 0.837, respectively (all p < 0.001). Parameters reflecting renal function (first and maximum serum creatinine), hematologic function (mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet distribution width), and inflammatory status (lymphocyte per monocyte ratio) were among the most important predictors. Accurate out-of-hospital survival prediction in CAD can be achieved using routine laboratory parameters. ML outperformed clinical risk scores in predicting out-of-hospital mortality in a prospective all-comers PCI population and has the potential to precisely phenotype patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.