Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438936›Full record

SynthesisJournal of translational medicine2024

Genetic susceptibility to caffeine intake and metabolism: a systematic review.

Jazreel Ju-Li Low, Brendan Jen-Wei Tan, Ling-Xiao Yi, Zhi-Dong Zhou, Eng-King Tan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Lifestyle medicine for neuroprotection: evidence and implementation in Asian contexts.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Reducing the risk of sudden unexpected infant death: the caffeine hypothesis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jazreel Ju-Li LowDepartment of Neurology, Singapore General Hospital Campus, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0006-8177-9766
Brendan Jen-Wei TanDepartment of Neurology, Singapore General Hospital Campus, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Ling-Xiao YiNeuroscience and Behavioural Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Zhi-Dong ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Singapore General Hospital Campus, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Eng-King TanDepartment of Neurology, Singapore General Hospital Campus, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore. EKL2EKL2@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoffee and tea consumption account for most caffeine intake and 2-3 billion cups are taken daily around the world. Caffeine dependence is a widespread but under recognized problem.

objectivesTo conduct a systematic review on the genetic susceptibility factors affecting caffeine metabolism and caffeine reward and their association with caffeine intake. METHODOLOGY: We conducted PubMed and Embase searches using the terms "caffeine", "reward", "gene", "polymorphism", "addiction", "dependence" and "habit" from inception till 2024. The demographics, genetic and clinical data from included studies were extracted and analyzed. Only case-control studies on habitual caffeine drinkers with at least 100 in each arm were included.

resultsA total of 2552 studies were screened and 26 studies involving 1,851,428 individuals were included. Several genes that were involved with caffeine metabolism such as CYP1A2, ADORA2A, AHR, POR, ABCG2, CYP2A6, PDSS2 and HECTD4 rs2074356 (A allele specific to East Asians and monomorphic in Europeans, Africans and Americans) were associated with habitual caffeine consumption with effect size difference of 3% to 32% in number of cups of caffeinated drink per day per effect allele. In addition, ALDH2 was linked to the Japanese population. Genes associated with caffeine reward included BDNF, SLC6A4, GCKR, MLXIPL and dopaminergic genes such as DRD2 and DAT1 which had around 2-5% effect size difference in number of cups of caffeinated drink for each allele per day.

conclusionSeveral genes that were involved in caffeine metabolism and reward were associated with up to 30% effect size difference in number of cups of caffeinated drink per day, and some associations were specific to certain ethnicities. Identification of at-risk caffeine dependence individuals can lead to early diagnosis and stratification of at-risk vulnerable individuals such as pregnant women and children, and can potentially lead to development of drug targets for dependence to caffeine.

Indexed as

CaffeineGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseRewardCoffeeHumansCaffeineCoffee

Identifiers

PMID39438936
PMCPMC11515775

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.