Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439358›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2024

Ultradian rhythms of activity in a wild subterranean rodent.

Kyle T Finn, Otto Brede, Nigel C Bennett, Markus Zöttl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyle T FinnDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3119-9510
Otto BredeEcology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Nigel C BennettDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9748-2947
Markus ZöttlEcology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5582-2306

Funding

Crafoordska StiftelsenNational Research FoundationSARChI Chair of Mammal Behavioural Ecology and Physiology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animals adapt their activity patterns to the best environmental conditions using daily rhythms. African mole-rats are among the mammals that have become models for studying how these rhythms can be entrained by light or temperature in experimental laboratory studies. However, it is unclear whether they exhibit similar circadian rhythms in their natural lightless, subterranean environment. In this study, we used biologging to investigate the activity rhythms of wild, highveld mole-rats. We show that their activity cycle exhibited an ultradian rhythm with a length between 4 and 8 h. On an individual level, mole-rats displayed about five activity bouts per day, occurring at various times during the day and night. On a population level, activity peaked in the afternoon, coinciding with the peak in ambient temperature. Our research suggests that wild subterranean mammals, which experience reduced environmental variation, are unlikely to show clear circadian rhythmicity in activity patterns. Instead, activity periods are distributed over several bouts throughout the day and night, and activity coincides with the peak in daily temperature. We propose that ultradian rhythms in activity may be more common than previously thought and discuss how physiological processes may generate differences in periodicity between laboratory and wild populations.

Indexed as

Mole RatsUltradian RhythmAnimalsCircadian RhythmFemaleMaleMotor ActivityTemperaturebehaviourcircadian clocklocomotor activitymole-ratpolyphasic activity

Identifiers

PMID39439358
PMCPMC11496949

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.