SynthesisJournal of medicine and life2024
Diagnostic accuracy of active pulmonary tuberculosis screening during detention admission: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of medicine and life, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals entering incarceration are at high risk for infectious diseases, other ill conditions, and risky behavior. Typically, the status of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is not known at the time of admission. Early detection and treatment are essential for effective TB control. So far, no study has compared the diagnostic accuracy of various TB screening tools in detention using a network meta-analysis (NMA). We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of active PTB screening tests upon detention admission. We searched PubMed, Global Index Medicus, the Cochrane Library electronic databases, and grey literature for publications reporting detention TB entry screening in March 2022 and January 2024. Inclusion was non-restrictive regarding time, language, location, reference standards, or screening tests. Eligible study designs comprised comparative, observational, and diagnostic studies. Publications had to report TB screening of individuals entering confinement and provide data for diagnostic accuracy calculations. The QUADAS-2 tool was designed to assess the quality of primary diagnostic accuracy studies. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022307863) and conducted without external funding. We screened a total of 2,455 records. Despite extensive searching, no studies met our inclusion criteria. However, we identified evidence revealing key differences in screening algorithm application. In conclusion, more diagnostic accuracy data on TB screening algorithms for detention admission worldwide needs to be collected. We recommend that global TB initiatives set up multi-site studies to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of TB screening on admission in low- and high-prevalence criminal justice systems. Further network meta-analyses of these studies could inform policymakers and public health experts to establish or fine-tune TB control in detention settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.