ArticleBiological trace element research2025
Associations of Urinary Cadmium with Body Composition and Fat Distribution in US Adults: Findings from NHANES 2011-2018.
Article in Biological trace element research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of cadmium (Cd) on metabolic physiology remain controversial. Given the varying metabolic impacts associated with different body compositions, investigating the relationship between Cd exposure and body composition may facilitate further research. Here, the associations of body composition and fat distribution with urine Cd (UCd) were evaluated. This analysis included 2979 adult participants from the 2011-2018 National Health and Demographic Survey (NHANES). UCd was measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and adjusted for urinary creatinine. Body composition and fat distribution were estimated using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The study results show that UCd was negatively associated with fat mass index (FMI) and percent fat mass (p for trend < 0.001), and the negative correlation between UCd and FMI was stronger in males and smokers (all p for interaction < 0.05). In terms of abdominal fat distribution, UCd was negatively associated with abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) mass (p for trend < 0.001), but with abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass only in those with low percent fat mass (< 32.3%) (p for trend = 0.026 and p for interaction < 0.05). UCd was positively related to percent VAT (p for trend < 0.001) and visceral-to-subcutaneous (VAT/SAT) ratio (p for trend = 0.003). And there was a significant negative association between UCd and android-to-gynoid (A/G) ratio (p for trend = 0.001). Meanwhile, UCd was negatively correlated with fat-free mass index (FFMI) (p for trend < 0.001). And the negative correlation between UCd and FFMI was stronger in males, smokers, and individuals with < 32.3 percent fat mass (all p for interaction < 0.05). We found the association of UCd with body composition and fat distribution, with distinct patterns observed in different demographic groups. These findings underscore the importance of considering UCd exposure in the context of body composition and fat distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39441232What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.