ReviewJournal of neuropathology and experimental neurology2025
New criteria to predict LATE-NC in the clinical setting: Probable/Possible LATE and LANS.
Review in Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular signatures and biomarker development for limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE).Acta neuropathologica · 2026Review
- Specific atrophy patterns distinguish tau and TDP-43 pathology: a longitudinal MRI ante-mortem study.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Differences and overlaps in TDP-43 pathology of 'pure' LATE-NC compared to LATE-NC coexisting with Alzheimer's disease.Acta neuropathologica · 2025Article
- Cognitive and neuropsychological trajectories in patients with mixed neurodegenerative pathologies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Celebrating 40 years of the University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Research Center.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This review discusses terminology recently proposed for the classification of dementia and, more specifically, nosology related to aging-associated TDP-43 pathology: limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE), and limbic-predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome (LANS). While the "gold standard" for these clinical conditions is still LATE neuropathologic changes (LATE-NC), clinical criteria and biomarkers are evolving. The newly proposed clinical rubrics are discussed with emphasis on the need for terminology that acknowledges the distinctions between clinical syndrome-, molecular biomarker-, and pathologically defined disease concepts. As further progress is made on research into the specific biomarker-based detection and prediction of TDP-43 proteinopathy in the clinical setting, the definitions of "Probable" and "Possible" LATE are likely to become more useful clinically. For people interested in the pathological diagnoses or basic research related to LATE-NC, the relevant terminology remains unchanged by the newly proposed clinical criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.