Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39441719›Full record

ArticleCell reports2024

Protein structural context of cancer mutations reveals molecular mechanisms and candidate driver genes.

Diego Chillón-Pino, Mihaly Badonyi, Colin A Semple, Joseph A Marsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Structural insight into the function of human peptidyl arginine deiminase 6.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diego Chillón-PinoMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Mihaly BadonyiMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Colin A SempleMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Joseph A MarshMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: joseph.marsh@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00035/9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in protein structure determination and modeling allow us to study the structural context of human genetic variants on an unprecedented scale. Here, we analyze millions of cancer-associated missense mutations based on their structural locations and predicted perturbative effects. By considering the collective properties of mutations at the level of individual proteins, we identify distinct patterns associated with tumor suppressors and oncogenes. Tumor suppressors are enriched in structurally damaging mutations, consistent with loss-of-function mechanisms, while oncogene mutations tend to be structurally mild, reflecting selection for gain-of-function driver mutations and against loss-of-function mutations. Although oncogenes are difficult to distinguish from genes with no role in cancer using only structural damage, we find that the three-dimensional clustering of mutations is highly predictive. These observations allow us to identify candidate driver genes and speculate about their molecular roles, which we expect will have general utility in the analysis of cancer sequencing data.

Indexed as

MutationNeoplasmsOncogenesHumansMutation, MissenseCP: CancerCP: Genomicsgain-of-functionloss-of-functionMissense mutationsoncogenesprotein stabilityprotein structurestructural bioinformaticstumor suppressors

Identifiers

PMID39441719
PMCPMC7617530

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.