ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2024
Prevalence of autonomic dysreflexia during spinal cord stimulation after spinal cord injury.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapy-specific motoneuron activation with epidural and dorsal root ganglion stimulation in spinal cord injury.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of spinal cord hypertension syndrome in water-mediated uniportal full endoscopic thoracolumbar surgery: a single-center experience.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Effective management of orthostatic hypotension in a patient with complete spinal cord injury using a portable transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation device: A case report.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2026Article
- Electroceuticals for Paralympic Athletes: A Fair Play and Classification Concern?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Cumulative Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation with Locomotor Training Safely Improves Trunk Control in Children with Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Neuromodulation techniques for the treatment of spinal cord injury: current progress, challenges, and future prospects.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Epidural Stimulation and Resistance Training (REST-SCI) for Overground Locomotion After Spinal Cord Injury: Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular safety of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Article
- Percutaneous spinal stimulation to enhance gait and alleviate functional impairments in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, clinical trials have shown that spinal cord stimulation can restore motor functions that were thought to be permanently impaired in persons with spinal cord injury. However, the off-target effects of delivering electrical impulses to intertwined spinal networks remain largely unknown. This generates safety concerns for this otherwise fast-progressing technology. Herein, we present the prevalence of autonomic dysreflexia (AD) that occurred during implanted spinal cord stimulation testing for motor activation of the lower extremities. Eleven participants with spinal cord injury underwent implantation of temporary percutaneous epidural and dorsal root ganglia stimulation leads. Participants completed two days of parameter testing at baseline, then six days of motor rehabilitation sessions, and two days of parameter testing at end of study. The goal of parameter testing was to determine electrode configuration(s), pulse amplitudes, and frequencies that activated lumbosacral spinal sensorimotor networks that generate lower extremity functions. During all parameter testing sessions, continuous blood pressure and heart rate monitoring recordings were collected. Evidence of autonomic dysreflexia was found in 22% of all parameter tests with participants at rest. Most of these episodes (97%) were asymptomatic. These episodes occurred more frequently when using epidural stimulation, at or near amplitudes that elicited whole leg muscle activation and using a wide-field electrode configuration. Although monitoring occurred during passive testing, motor rehabilitation sessions use stimulation for longer periods, at higher frequencies and amplitudes. These sessions may carry additional risks of autonomic dysreflexia. Investigation of these concerns should continue as spinal cord stimulation progresses toward clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.