ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2024
Risk of first hip fracture under treatment with zoledronic acid versus alendronate: a NOREPOS cohort study of 88,000 Norwegian men and women in outpatient care.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the risk of hip fracture associated with zoledronic acid treatment compared to alendronate on a population level. The risk of hip fracture was lower in women using zoledronic acid and higher in women who had discontinued treatment. The findings support the effectiveness of intravenous bisphosphonate. PURPOSE: To investigate whether zoledronic acid (ZOL) was associated with a lower risk of the first hip fracture than alendronate (ALN) in Norway using real-world data.
methodsNationwide data on drugs dispensed in outpatient pharmacies were individually linked with all hospital-treated hip fractures. Individuals aged 50-89 years without previous hip fracture were included at their first filling of a prescription for ALN or ZOL during 2005-2016. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for first hip fracture by time-varying exposure to ZOL versus ALN were estimated in sex-stratified flexible parametric survival analyses. Covariates included time-varying accumulated ALN exposure and comorbidity level expressed by the prescription-based Rx-Risk Comorbidity Index, marital status, education, and residential urbanity.
resultsOf 75,250 women who initiated treatment, 72,614 (96.5%) were exposed to ALN and 6366 (8.5%) to ZOL. Of 12,739 men who initiated treatment, 12,311 (96.6%) were exposed to ALN and 784 (6.2%) to ZOL. In women, the HR for first hip fracture was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.61-0.91) for ZOL versus ALN. In men, the corresponding HR was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.32-1.07). Discontinued treatment was associated with increased risk compared with current ALN treatment in women (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.24-1.42, men: HR 1.13 (95% CI: 0.95-1.35)).
conclusionsIn women, the risk of first hip fracture when treated with ZOL was 25% lower than when treated with ALN. Discontinued treatment was associated with a 33% increase in hip fracture risk. Similar, albeit statistically non-significant, results were observed in men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.