ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2024
Structural and dynamical insights revealed the anti-glioblastoma potential of withanolides from Withania coagulans against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR).
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextGlioblastoma (GBM), well known as grade 4 tumors due to its progressive malignant features such as vascular proliferation and necrosis, is the most aggressive form of primary brain tumor found in adults. Mutations and amplifications in the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) contribute to almost 25% of GBM tumors. And thus, VEGFR has been declared the primary target in glioblastoma therapeutic strategies. However, many studies have been previously reported that include GBM as global therapeutics challenge, but they lack the molecular level insights that could help in understanding the biological function of a therapeutically important protein playing a major role in the disease and design the best strategies to develop the potential drugs.
methodsTherefore, to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first time of kind, which involves multi-in silico approaches to predict the inhibition potential of withanolides from Withania coagulan against VEGFR. The study is actually based on determining the mode of action of five isolates: withanolide J, withaperuvin, 27-hydroxywithanolide I, coagule E, and coagule E, along with their respective binding energies. Molecular docking simulations revealed primarily four ligands, withanolide J (- 7.33 kJ/mol), 27-withanolide (- 7.01 kJ/mol), ajugine, withaperuvin (- 6.89 kJ/mol), and ajugine E (- 6.39 kJ/mol), to have significant binding potencies against the protein. Ligand binding was found to enhance the confirmational stability of the protein revealed through RMSD analysis, and RMSF assessment revealed the protein residues especially from 900-1000 surrounding the binding of the protein. Structural and dynamics of the protein via dynamics cross-correlation movement (DCCM) and principal component analysis (PCA) in both the unbound form and complexed with most potent ligand, withanolide J, reveal the ligand binding affecting the entire conformational integrity of the protein stabilized by hydrogen bonds and electrostatic attractions. Free energy of binding estimations by means of molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MMPBSA) method further revealed the withanolide J to have maximum binding potency of the all ligands. Withanolide J in final was also found to have suitable molecular characterizations to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB +) and reasonable human intestinal absorption ability determined by ADMET profiling via admetSAR tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39443392What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.