Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443677›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2024

Process mining in mHealth data analysis.

Michael Winter, Berthold Langguth, Winfried Schlee, Rüdiger Pryss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reciprocal Relationship Between Cardiovascular Risk and Attainment of Blood Pressure and Cholesterol Targets in Users of a Mobile Health App.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Tinnitus Measured in Everyday Life: A Literature Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael WinterInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. michael.winter@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2561-7923
Berthold LangguthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-510X
Winfried Schlee *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Rüdiger Pryss *Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1522-785X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective article explores how process mining can extract clinical insights from mobile health data and complement data-driven techniques like machine learning. Despite technological advances, challenges such as selection bias and the complex dynamics of health data require advanced approaches. Process mining focuses on analyzing temporal process patterns and provides complementary insights into health condition variability. The article highlights the potential of process mining for analyzing mHealth data and beyond.

Identifiers

PMID39443677
PMCPMC11499602

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.