ArticleBMC oral health2024
Evaluation of cyst treatment technique, cyst type, size differences and healing by fractal analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spontaneous regression of dentigerous cyst in a impacted mandibular first permanent molar with eruptive potential: a case report.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Imaging-Guided Surgical Decision-Making and Bone Healing in Mandibular Cystic and Tumor-like Lesions: A Case-Based Radiologic Observation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intraosseous lesions of the jaw: a clinicohistological study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparison of Decompression vs Enucleation Using Fractal Analysis with Panoramic Radiography for Odontogenic Cysts.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigation of changes caused by Rapid Maxillary Expansion in mandibular bone and temporomandibular joint trabecular structure using fractal analysis.BMC oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of the study was to evaluate the trabeculation increase of treated mandibular cysts. MATERIAL AND
methodThe study included 26 female and 33 male patients (age mean: 38,4 years) with cysts larger than 3 cm in the posterior region of the mandible who were admitted to the same center. Two groups in treatment technique: marsupialization (n = 29) and enucleation (n = 30). Four groups in cyst types: dentigerous cyst (n = 21), keratocyst (n = 19), radicular cyst (n = 15) and residual cyst (n = 4). Cyst size was divided into two categories: smaller than 5.5 cm (n = 31) and larger than 5.5 cm (n = 28). Panoramic radiographs (PR) of the patients were analyzed at the beginning, 6. month and 12. month.
resultAt the end of the treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of Fractal Analysis (FA) between patients treated with marsupialization and enucleation, but considering that the cysts in the marsupialization group were larger in size, a faster increase in FA was observed in the marsupialization group. When the cysts were grouped according to their size, it was observed that healing tissues in cysts smaller than 5.5 cm reached normal FA values faster, while healing in the middle of cysts larger than 5.5 cm took more time.
conclusionsFA is a reproducible and reliable method. In large cysts, marsupialization results in a faster recovery, but FA values at the end of treatment are similar to the enucleation group. Cysts larger than 5.5 cm show a more rapid increase in Fractal Dimension (FD). The centre of the cysts is the area that heals the latest. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the difference in healing between cyst types. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.