Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444040›Full record

ArticleBiological research2024

Enhancing late postmortem interval prediction: a pilot study integrating proteomics and machine learning to distinguish human bone remains over 15 years.

Camila Garcés-Parra, Pablo Saldivia, Mauricio Hernández, Elena Uribe, Juan Román, Marcela Torrejón, José L Gutiérrez, Guillermo Cabrera-Vives, María de Los Ángeles García-Robles, William Aguilar and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Age Estimation: Current Perspectives and Future Considerations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Camila Garcés-ParraGene Expression and Regulation Laboratory (GEaRLab), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Pablo SaldiviaMelisa Institute, Concepción, Chile.
Mauricio HernándezMelisa Institute, Concepción, Chile.
Elena UribeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Juan RománDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Marcela TorrejónDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
José L GutiérrezDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Guillermo Cabrera-VivesDepartment of Computer Science, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
María de Los Ángeles García-RoblesBioCell Laboratory, Department of Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
William AguilarDepartment of Anatomy and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Miguel SotoDepartment of Anatomy and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Estefanía Tarifeño-SaldiviaGene Expression and Regulation Laboratory (GEaRLab), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile. etarisal@udec.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5311-2661

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 11190401Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 22211332Universidad de concepción 2023000755INV
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining the postmortem interval (PMI) accurately remains a significant challenge in forensic sciences, especially for intervals greater than 5 years (late PMI). Traditional methods often fail due to the extensive degradation of soft tissues, necessitating reliance on bone material examinations. The precision in estimating PMIs diminishes with time, particularly for intervals between 1 and 5 years, dropping to about 50% accuracy. This study aims to address this issue by identifying key protein biomarkers through proteomics and machine learning, ultimately enhancing the accuracy of PMI estimation for intervals exceeding 15 years.

methodsProteomic analysis was conducted using LC-MS/MS on skeletal remains, specifically focusing on the tibia and ribs. Protein identification was performed using two strategies: a tryptic-specific search and a semitryptic search, the latter being particularly beneficial in cases of natural protein degradation. The Random Forest algorithm was used to model protein abundance data, enabling the prediction of PMI. A thorough screening process, combining importance scores and SHAP values, was employed to identify the most informative proteins for model's training and accuracy.

resultsA minimal set of three biomarkers-K1C13, PGS1, and CO3A1-was identified, significantly improving the prediction accuracy between PMIs of 15 and 20 years. The model, based on protein abundance data from semitryptic peptides in tibia samples, achieved sustained 100% accuracy across 100 iterations. In contrast, non-supervised methods like PCA and MCA did not yield comparable results. Additionally, the use of semitryptic peptides outperformed tryptic peptides, particularly in tibia proteomes, suggesting their potential reliability in late PMI prediction.

conclusionsDespite limitations such as sample size and PMI range, this study demonstrates the feasibility of combining proteomics and machine learning for accurate late PMI predictions. Future research should focus on broader PMI ranges and various bone types to further refine and standardize forensic proteomic methodologies for PMI estimation.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMachine LearningPostmortem ChangesProteomicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody RemainsBone and BonesChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkersBiomarker discoveryForensic scienceMachine learningPostmortem intervalProteomics

Identifiers

PMID39444040
PMCPMC11515459

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.