Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444437›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

Insight into the chemical composition, antioxidant capacity, meat quality, fatty acid profile, and volatile compounds of yellow-feathered chickens fed with fermented pineapple residue.

Panpan Lu, Ruiting Guo, Chunlian Zou, Hang Chen, Dan Chen, Lu Yang, Huize Tan, Siqiao Wu, Yaxue Lv, Zhengzhong Xiao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Panpan LuCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control/Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture/State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Ruiting GuoCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control/Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture/State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Chunlian ZouCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control/Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture/State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Hang ChenCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control/Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture/State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Dan ChenWens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd., Yunfu 527439, China.
Lu YangWens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd., Yunfu 527439, China.
Huize TanWens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd., Yunfu 527439, China.
Siqiao WuCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control/Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture/State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Yaxue LvCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control/Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture/State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Zhengzhong XiaoHenry Fork School of Biology and Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Utilization and Conservation of Food and Medicinal Resources in Northern Region, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512005, China.
Chunqi GaoCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control/Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture/State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluated the effect of dietary fermented pineapple residue (FPR) on the chemical composition, antioxidant capacity, meat quality, fatty acid profile, and volatile compounds in yellow-feathered chickens. GC-IMS technique combined with multivariate analysis were performed to clarify the key volatile compounds. The results showed that dietary FPR improved meat quality by increasing the antioxidant capacity and pH value and decreasing cooking loss of breast muscle. The fatty acid profile was altered in breast muscle of chickens that fed with FPR. GC-IMS detected 43 volatile compounds in breast muscle, including mainly aldehydes, alcohols, esters, and ketones. Among them, 12 volatile compounds could serve as potential aroma markers to distinguish meat flavor of chickens fed with FPR. Correlation analysis revealed that C18:1n9c, C18:2n6, and PUFA are important contributors for meat flavor formation. In conclusion, dietary FPR improved antioxidant capacity, meat quality, fatty acid profile, and volatile compounds of breast muscle in chickens.

Indexed as

ChickensFatty acid compositionFermented pineapple residueMeat flavorOxidative stability

Identifiers

PMID39444437
PMCPMC11497432

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.