Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444914›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024

Sex-related disparities in aortic stenosis from disease awareness to treatment: a state-of-the-art review.

Clare Appleby, Sabine Bleiziffer, Peter Bramlage, Victoria Delgado, Helene Eltchaninoff, Catherine Gebhard, Christian Hengstenberg, Jana Kurucova, Philipp Marx, Tanja K Rudolph and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Left ventricular changes in moderate aortic stenosis in women compared to men.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding Aortic Stenosis and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Women.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Clare ApplebyDepartment of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Sabine BleizifferDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, University Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Peter BramlageInstitute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg, Germany.
Victoria DelgadoDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Hospital University Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Helene EltchaninoffDepartment of Cardiology, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, U1096, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.
Catherine GebhardDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Christian HengstenbergDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jana KurucovaEdwards Lifesciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Philipp MarxEdwards Lifesciences, Nyon, Switzerland.
Tanja K RudolphDepartment of General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre Nordrhine-Westfalia, University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Wojtek WojakowskiDivision of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This state-of-the-art review aimed to synthesize evidence from various sex-stratified studies on aortic stenosis (AS), focusing on the difference in clinical presentation, anatomical characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of AS. In comparison to men, women with AS are present at later stages, are older, more symptomatic, frailer, and exhibit higher operative risk [Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score]. Women tend to have smaller aortic valve (AV) areas and left ventricular (LV) outflow tract, leading to lower stroke volumes (SVs) than men and have a higher prevalence of paradoxical, low-flow, low-gradient AS. In women, chronic pressure overload due to AS results in concentric LV remodelling and hypertrophy, characterized by reduced LV cavities, higher filling pressures, lower wall stress, and more diastolic dysfunction. Conversely, men exhibit more dilated eccentric LV remodelling and hypertrophy. AVs in women are less calcified but more fibrotic. Moreover, women are often underdiagnosed, have severity underestimated, and experience delays or receive fewer referrals for AV replacement (AVR). However, women tend to benefit from transcatheter AVR (TAVR) with a long-term survival advantage over men, although the incidence of vascular complications and bleeding events in 30 days after TAVR is higher in women. Surgical AVR (SAVR) in women has high operative risk, is technically demanding and has poorer outcomes with increased mortality at 30 days compared to men. According to the STS score and EuroSCORE, the female sex itself is considered a risk factor for SAVR. Therefore, addressing sex-related disparities in AS and increasing awareness among physicians promises improved diagnosis and treatment, facilitating equitable care and the development of sex-specific personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Aortic stenosis (AS)sex differencessurgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)women

Identifiers

PMID39444914
PMCPMC11494558

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.