Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446295›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2024

Current Evidence Regarding the Evaluation and Management of Neonatal Delirium.

Olivia Ruth, Sheri Tomajko, Emman Dabaja, Erin Munsel, Kayla Rice, Christina Cwynar, Melissa Maye, Nasuh Malas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olivia RuthDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Michigan Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. oruth@med.umich.edu.
Sheri TomajkoDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Michigan Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Emman DabajaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Erin MunselDepartment of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kayla RiceDepartment of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christina CwynarDepartment of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Michigan Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Melissa MayeHenry Ford Health and Michigan State University Health Sciences, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Nasuh MalasDepartment of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Michigan Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewNewborns and infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may be at uniquely high risk of developing delirium. Because there is a dearth of NICU-focused literature, providers must rely on evidence derived from older children and infants in other care settings to guide management. The literature was rigorously reviewed to highlight evidence specific to newborns and infants and is summarized here. RECENT

findingsDelirium likely occurs in newborns and infants at similar or higher rates than what is seen in other care settings. Recent literature calls particular attention to the lack of assessment tools validated in a NICU setting. Evidence for the evaluation and management of delirium in the NICU is lacking. More study specific to the NICU is needed to build consensus toward best practice.

Indexed as

DeliriumIntensive Care Units, NeonatalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant deliriumManagementNeonatal deliriumNICUPreventionReview

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.