Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Multicentric study on the reproducibility and robustness of PET-based radiomics features with a realistic activity painting phantom.

Piroska Kallos-Balogh, Norman Felix Vas, Zoltan Toth, Szabolcs Szakall, Peter Szabo, Ildiko Garai, Zita Kepes, Attila Forgacs, Lilla Szatmáriné Egeresi, Dahlbom Magnus and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Piroska Kallos-BaloghDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Translational Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-0026
Norman Felix VasDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Translational Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Zoltan TothMedicopus Healthcare Provider and Public Nonprofit Ltd., Somogy County Moritz Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8096-3813
Szabolcs SzakallPozitron-Diagnostics Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
Peter SzaboScanomed Ltd., Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Ildiko GaraiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Translational Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Zita KepesDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Translational Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Attila ForgacsMediso Medical Imaging Systems, Budapest, Hungary.
Lilla Szatmáriné EgeresiDivision of Radiology and Imaging Science, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3434-1914
Dahlbom MagnusAhmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Laszlo BalkayDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Translational Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, we developed an "activity painting" tool for PET image simulation; however, it could simulate heterogeneous patterns only in the air. We aimed to improve this phantom technique to simulate arbitrary lesions in a radioactive background to perform relevant multi-center radiomic analysis. We conducted measurements moving a 22Na point source in a 20-liter background volume filled with 5 kBq/mL activity with an adequately controlled robotic system to prevent the surge of the water. Three different lesion patterns were "activity-painted" in five PET/CT cameras, resulting in 8 different reconstructions. We calculated 46 radiomic indeces (RI) for each lesion and imaging setting, applying absolute and relative discretization. Reproducibility and reliability were determined by the inter-setting coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Hypothesis tests were used to compare RI between lesions. By simulating precisely the same lesions, we confirmed that the reconstructed voxel size and the spatial resolution of different PET cameras were critical for higher order RI. Considering conventional RIs, the SUVpeak and SUVmean proved the most reliable (CV<10%). CVs above 25% are more common for higher order RIs, but we also found that low CVs do not necessarily imply robust parameters but often rather insensitive RIs. Based on the hypothesis test, most RIs could clearly distinguish between the various lesions using absolute resampling. ICC analysis also revealed that most RIs were more reproducible with absolute discretization. The activity painting method in a real radioactive environment proved suitable for precisely detecting the radiomic differences derived from the different camera settings and texture characteristics. We also found that inter-setting CV is not an appropriate metric for analyzing RI parameters' reliability and robustness. Although multicentric cohorts are increasingly common in radiomics analysis, realistic texture phantoms can provide indispensable information on the sensitivity of an RI and how an individual RI parameter measures the texture.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiomicsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID39446842
PMCPMC11500893

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.