Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446867›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

LLM-Enhanced multimodal detection of fake news.

Jingwei Wang, Ziyue Zhu, Chunxiao Liu, Rong Li, Xin Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingwei WangSchool of Humanities and Communication, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-9842-2171
Ziyue ZhuSchool of Information and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Chunxiao LiuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Rong LiSchool of Humanities and Communication, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xin WuSchool of Humanities and Communication, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fake news detection is growing in importance as a key topic in the information age. However, most current methods rely on pre-trained small language models (SLMs), which face significant limitations in processing news content that requires specialized knowledge, thereby constraining the efficiency of fake news detection. To address these limitations, we propose the FND-LLM Framework, which effectively combines SLMs and LLMs to enhance their complementary strengths and explore the capabilities of LLMs in multimodal fake news detection. The FND-LLM framework integrates the textual feature branch, the visual semantic branch, the visual tampering branch, the co-attention network, the cross-modal feature branch and the large language model branch. The textual feature branch and visual semantic branch are responsible for extracting the textual and visual information of the news content, respectively, while the co-attention network is used to refine the interrelationship between the textual and visual information. The visual tampering branch is responsible for extracting news image tampering features. The cross-modal feature branch enhances inter-modal complementarity through the CLIP model, while the large language model branch utilizes the inference capability of LLMs to provide auxiliary explanation for the detection process. Our experimental results indicate that the FND-LLM framework outperforms existing models, achieving improvements of 0.7%, 6.8% and 1.3% improvements in overall accuracy on Weibo, Gossipcop, and Politifact, respectively.

Indexed as

DeceptionAlgorithmsHumansSemanticsSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID39446867
PMCPMC11500920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.