Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446967›Full record

ReviewNutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition2025

Nutrition support for patients with renal dysfunction in the intensive care unit: A narrative review.

Joanna L Otis, Nicholas M Parker, Rebecca A Busch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Nutrition support for patients with renal dysfunction in the intensive care unit: A narrative review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna L OtisDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Nicholas M ParkerDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Rebecca A BuschDivision of Acute Care and Regional General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-9515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing optimal nutrition support in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a challenging and dynamic process. Energy, protein, fluid, electrolyte, and micronutrient requirements all can be altered in patients with acute, chronic, and acute-on-chronic kidney disease. Given that renal dysfunction occurs in up to one-half of ICU patients, it is imperative that nutrition support providers understand how renal dysfunction, its metabolic consequences, and its treatments, including renal replacement therapy (RRT), affect patients' nutrition needs. Data on nutrient requirements in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction are sparse. This article provides an overview of renal dysfunction in the ICU and identifies and addresses the unique nutrition challenges present among these patients, including those receiving RRT, as supported by the available literature and guidelines.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsNutritional SupportRenal Replacement TherapyAcute Kidney InjuryCritical CareHumansNutritional RequirementsNutritional Statusacute renal failureadultcritical carefluids‐electrolytes/acid‐baseminerals/trace elementsrenal diseasevitamins

Identifiers

PMID39446967
PMCPMC11713211

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.