ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2024
Simulating irregular symmetry breaking in gut cross sections using a novel energy-optimization approach in growth-elasticity.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Growth-elasticity (also known as morphoelasticity) is a powerful model framework for understanding complex shape development in soft biological tissues. At each instant, by mapping how continuum building blocks have grown geometrically and how they respond elastically to the push-and-pull from their neighbors, the shape of the growing structure is determined from a state of mechanical equilibrium. As mechanical loads continue to be added to the system through growth, many interesting shapes, such as smooth wavy wrinkles, sharp creases, and deep folds, can form on the tissue surface from a relatively flatter geometry. Previous numerical simulations of growth-elasticity have reproduced many interesting shapes resembling those observed in reality, such as the foldings on mammalian brains and guts. In the case of mammalian guts, it has been shown that wavy wrinkles, deep folds, and sharp creases on the interior organ surface can be simulated even under a simple assumption of isotropic uniform growth in the interior layer of the organ. Interestingly, the simulated patterns are all regular along the tube's circumference, with either all smooth or all sharp indentations, whereas some undulation patterns in reality exhibit irregular patterns and a mixture of sharp creases and smooth indentations along the circumference. Can we simulate irregular indentation patterns without further complicating the growth patterning? In this paper, we have discovered abundant shape solutions with irregular indentation patterns by developing a Rayleigh-Ritz finite-element method (FEM). In contrast to previous Galerkin FEMs, which solve the weak formulation of the mechanical-equilibrium equations, the new method formulates an optimization problem for the discretized energy functional, whose critical points are equivalent to solutions obtained by solving the mechanical-equilibrium equations. This new method is more robust than previous methods. Specifically, it does not require the initial guess to be near a solution to achieve convergence, and it allows control over the direction of numerical iterates across the energy landscape. This approach enables the capture of more solutions that cannot be easily reached by previous methods. In addition to the previously found regular smooth and non-smooth configurations, we have identified a new transitional irregular smooth shape, new shapes with a mixture of smooth and non-smooth surface indentations, and a variety of irregular patterns with different numbers of creases. Our numerical results demonstrate that growth-elasticity modeling can match more shape patterns observed in reality than previously thought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.